Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Author: admini

Desktop defenses: Host-based intrusion prevention may be last best defense

Posted on May 22, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

A year ago, network-based IPS was all the rage, whereas HIPS had an estimated 1% market-penetration rate, according to Gartner Inc. in Stamford, Conn. But new attack routes into the enterprise — such as the recent Windows Metafile (WMF) vulnerability — have forced IT organizations to rethink their tactics. In a recent Forrester survey of 150 enterprise technology decision-makers, 28% of respondents said they plan to purchase desktop HIPS during the course of the year, says Lambert.

Alaska, however, is ahead of the game. It is most of the way through an implementation of Cisco Security Agent (CSA) from Cisco Systems Inc. Along with the 19,000 desktops — primarily Windows-based ones, with a few Linux and Macintosh systems — CSA also protects about 2,000 servers across dozens of data centers. Software like CSA watches for behavior that would indicate spyware activity, such as a program opening a file in a temporary folder.

Software like CSA watches for behavior that would indicate spyware activity, but that is by no means the only way such tools operate. Most include several functions: In addition to host intrusion prevention, they can incorporate adware protection, protection against buffer-overflow attacks, firewalling, various forms of system hardening, malicious mobile-code protection and even signature-based modules.

Proventia Desktop from Internet Security Systems Inc. (ISS) in Atlanta is used on about 2,500 seats campuswide, most of which are student laptops — 95% run Microsoft Windows XP and the rest are Macintoshes.

“Some colleges have attempted to dictate to their students, but you really can’t control what they put on their laptops,” says Hammon.

Unlike virus signatures, though, they need to be delivered only about once a month. Instead of constantly scanning and analyzing every system call and application as CSA does, its SpyWall software zeroes in on the primary avenue of attack – via Web browser. For example, SpyWall blocked the latest Internet Explorer createText-Range zero-day exploit without using any signatures. “After we put in SpyWall, we didn’t get any more infections for six months,” says Robert Wong, network administrator.

First came enterprise-class anti-virus tools and then firewalls, IDS and spyware protection. But with each advance, attackers managed to outwit the defenses. Antivirus and spyware technology now appear to be morphing into back-line defenses, which are used to mop up employee goofs and safeguard against known threats.

That’s why the likes of Symantec Corp., CA Inc. and Cisco are gobbling up desktop HIPS vendors: Symantec bought ManHunt, ISS acquired BlackICE, Cisco bought Okena, and CA now owns Tiny Software Inc.

The next major release of CA Integrated Threat Management will include a firewall and HIPS.

Read more

Researchers: spend to protect against one attack, not many

Posted on May 19, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

The paper, called “Economics of Information Security Investment in the Case of Simultaneous Attacks” breaks threats into two categories: distributed attacks, which come in the form of virus, spyware and spam, and targeted attacks from a hacker, said professor Qing Hu.

“No matter how much they spend on security, the budget is always low relative to the potential loss,” Huang said.

Targeted attacks have generally been shown to cause more financial damage than distributed attacks.

For enterprises, “we’ve gone past the time when people just attacked us as a game,” Behara said.

Huang and Hu will present the paper at the University of Cambridge during the Workshop on the Economics of Information Security, which runs from June 26 to June 28.

http://infoworld.com/article/06/05/19/78509_HNholesinapproach_1.html

Read more

Ballmer Talks Linux, Security, SaaS

Posted on May 19, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Microsoft is late to the SaaS party, unveiling it’s hosted-services game plan last fall. Over time, observers expect the company to roll out an array of hosted business applications as well.

Last week, Ballmer and a phalanx of other Microsoft executives took on the whole notion of ad-based revenue and defended their decision to pour money into MSN.

http://www.crn.com/sections/breakingnews/dailyarchives.jhtml;jsessionid=H4CUSKSRGZYCEQSNDBOCKICCJUMEKJVN?articleId=187202395

Read more

Do Not Intrude Registry gives up

Posted on May 18, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Blue Security, while working on getting back on-line, started posting on a TypePad blog.

http://www.xatrix.org/article.php?s=4383

Read more

Research Says Cisco, Microsoft Lead Security Spending

Posted on May 17, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

While Cisco has been marketing firewall technologies and other network-oriented security tools for almost a decade, Microsoft has only entered the applications market in the last year with several stand-alone products. The software giant is further expected to have an effect on the anti-virus market with the launch of its next-generation Windows operating system, known as Vista, scheduled to arrive sometime in 2007.
Rival Juniper Networks ranked second for such investments, far behind Cisco, with only four of the CSOs mentioning the company.

In a surprisingly good showing among applications vendors, Microsoft dwarfed other providers including anti-virus market leader Symantec in the report. Some 68 percent of those involved in the research said they currently use security software from Microsoft, while only 26 percent said they are using Symantec’s tools. Of those interviewed, 36 percent said they would prefer to work with one primary security software vendor, versus the 34 percent that indicated they would not want to consolidate security relationships, with 44 percent of those favoring the integrated approach listing Microsoft as their preferred provider.

Some 40 percent of the executives interviewed for the study said that they are currently evaluating applications-specific security measures. Of those executives, 62 percent said that they are somewhat likely to deploy applications-level security this year, with another 36 percent saying that they are either very likely or certain to do so.

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1963992,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594

Read more

Experts: Exchange patch OK, despite glitches

Posted on May 16, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Symantec Corp., in Cupertino, Calif., warned administrators to patch quickly and listed the Exchange vulnerability level as “High” on the company’s security response Web site.

http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid14_gci1188468,00.html

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 233
  • 234
  • 235
  • 236
  • 237
  • 238
  • 239
  • …
  • 421
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme