Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Author: admini

Compliance and Security

Posted on May 8, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

We’ve known for a while that meeting regulations (e.g. Sarbanes-Oxley and HIPAA) can be financially draining on enterprises, but the Getronics survey calls attention to underlying security issues.
IT organizations are limited in what they can achieve, and too much compliance work can take away resources from mission of securing the enterprise.

Goodall points out that the money is coming from across several departments, indicating that IT security is not seen as only an IT issue.

http://www.line56.com/articles/default.asp?ArticleID=7592

Read more

Novell makes moves to bolster its channel

Posted on May 8, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

“Put it this way: we are a vendor with $1.6bn in cash and assets, and we hope to spend some of that on acquisitions.”

http://www.computing.co.uk/crn/news/2155497/novell-makes-moves-bolster

Read more

Gartner Gives Cautious Nod to Oracle Identity Management

Posted on May 8, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

“Oracle’s acquisition of Thor was a good move because it had no UP product outside of its own Oracle product suite.

Hasan Rizvi, vice president of Security and Identity Management Products for Oracle, said that the company has seen “good customer momentum” based on its original strategy when it entered the identity management arena by purchasing Oblix. That strategy had three parts: provide a complete suite of best-in-class components, to spare customers who were struggling with integrated individual components; help customers with application integration as they struggle to integrate identity management components with business applications such as SAP, PeopleSoft HR and Siebel CRM; and to allow heterogeneous support and standards support in order to facilitate identity management technology deployment.

Oracle plans to announce four new Identity Manager customers on May 9: storage vendor Network Appliance; Gevity, a human resources outsourcing firm; Highmark, an insurance company; and Seguro Popular, a government agency in Mexico.

http://www.eweek.com/print_article2/0,1217,a=177631,00.asp

Read more

New SUSE Linux to debut this week

Posted on May 8, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Version 10.1 of SUSE Linux is understood to be an important milestone for Novell as it prepares to release the landmark version 10 of its business-focused SUSE Linux Enterprise (formerly known as the Novell Linux Desktop) operating system later this year.

The company’s president Ron Hovsepian has flagged version 10 of the operating system as mature enough to kickstart enterprise deployments in the next 12 to 18 months.

http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/New_SUSE_Linux_to_debut_this_week/0,2000061733,39255778,00.htm

Read more

Check Point Pitches UTM Security for Enterprises

Posted on May 8, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Check Point’s new VPN-1 UTM product line, sold as a package of software applications or loaded into one box as an appliance, is designed to let a company’s remote locations operate using the UTM approach, while allowing central IT administrators to manage and adjust the systems using the same controls offered in Check Point’s enterprise security products.

“We’re trying to help solve the problem of security sprawl, as customers have all kinds of security applications deployed at different points throughout their operations and this is hurting their ability to manage their defenses consistently and easily,” said Bill Jensen, product marketing manager at Check Point, headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel. “Enterprises have started looking at UTM and want a mixture [of applications] to help manage regional offices, but unless you can find a way to integrate UTM with the best-of-breed software that companies are running in their central security operations, you’re just introducing a new type of management headache,” he said. Jensen said Check Point’s new package allows administrators to conduct the same types of systemwide scans and maintenance work they already perform while pushing out any updates or policy changes to the distributed UTM systems automatically.

VPN-1 UTM includes intrusion prevention and anti-virus applications as well as an SSL [Secure Sockets Layer] VPN, network and Web-applications firewalls, and host-checking capabilities. Check Point said the VPN-1 UTM software package will retail at a starting price of $2,000.

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1958282,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594

Read more

SCADA on thin ice – Industrial control systems pose little-noticed security threat

Posted on May 8, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Vendors must develop industry-specific security software with critical infrastructure sectors, said Scott Borg, director and chief economist at the U.S. Cyber Consequences Unit. Currently, each sector has three or four software suppliers that everyone uses, he said. The same or similar products are used to protect oil refineries, hospitals, power grids and other facilities — all with different equipment and weaknesses. “No wonder we’ve got vulnerabilities,” Borg said.

Industrial control systems are the nervous system of critical infrastructure. They connect networks of sensors that read data, relay commands and send alerts when something goes wrong. The systems manage production and distribution of products and enforce safety procedures. Supervisory control and data acquisition systems and process control systems are two common types of control systems. SCADA systems place their computing power in the field and use radio and Internet connections to control many devices over a broad geographic area, often hundreds of miles. Process control systems centralize information technology in an operator’s console and offer real-time control of everything in a small geographic area or one facility. Facilities often have both kinds of systems in place.

SCADA and other control systems don’t have direct connections to the Internet, but malicious hackers can access them through facilities’ corporate networks that do connect to the Internet. The systems have little built-in security and are easy pickings. The electronic control systems that act as the nervous system for all critical infrastructures are insecure and pose disastrous risks to national security, cybersecurity experts warn. Average hackers can break into the systems, said Robert Graham, chief scientist at Internet Security Systems (ISS).

Attacks are rare because control systems are still complex and individualized enough to make cracking them difficult, although a hacker who knows a particular system well can break into it easily, said Jason Larson, senior cybersecurity researcher at the Idaho National Laboratory, which leads federal efforts into critical infrastructure cybersecurity. Even if a facility has not been attacked, that doesn’t mean it’s secure or the threat isn’t real, said Michael Assante, senior manager of critical infrastructure protection at the laboratory.

For example, during negotiations to provide penetration testing to a critical infrastructure facility, the facility’s operators confidently told an ISS team they didn’t need help because their control system was already secure.

http://www.fcw.com/article94273-05-08-06-Print

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 237
  • 238
  • 239
  • 240
  • 241
  • 242
  • 243
  • …
  • 421
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme