Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Author: admini

FDIC Issues Best Practices on Spyware Prevention and Detection

Posted on September 12, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

Spyware Infection Spyware is usually installed without a user’s knowledge or permission. However, users may intentionally install spyware without understanding the full ramifications of their actions. A user may be required to accept an End User Licensing Agreement (EULA), which often does not clearly inform the user about the extent or manner in which information is collected. In such cases, the software is installed without the user’s “informed consent.”

Spyware can be installed through the following methods:
* Downloaded with other Internet downloads in a practice called “bundling.” In many cases, all the licensing agreements may be included in one pop-up window that, unless read carefully, may leave the user unaware of “bundled” spyware.
* Directly downloaded by users who were persuaded that the technology offers a benefit. Some spyware claims to offer increased productivity, virus scanning capabilities or other benefits.
* Installed through an Internet browsing technique called “drive-by downloads.” In this technique, spyware is installed when a user simply visits a Web site. The user may be prompted to accept the download believing it is necessary in order to view the Web page. Another method is to prompt the user to install the program through pop-up windows that remain open, or download the software regardless of the action taken by the user.
* Automatically downloaded when users open or view unsolicited e-mail messages.

Behaviors Associated With Spyware Spyware can be difficult to detect and remove because it:
* Does not always appear as a running program in the Window’s Task Manager; therefore, the user may be unaware that his or her computer is infected.
* May not include a removal option in the Windows “Add/Remove Programs” function. When such an option is present, the removal process may not eliminate all components, or it may redirect the user to an Internet site to complete the removal. This often results in new or additional infection rather than removal. In addition, some spyware includes a feature to reinstall itself when any portion is deleted.
* May cause a further infestation by installing other spyware programs onto users’ computers.

Risks Associated With Spyware Spyware increases the risk to financial institutions by:
* Exploiting security vulnerabilities or settings, changing the computer configuration to relax security settings, or allowing a channel into the institution’s systems by circumventing the firewall. The result is that attackers can eavesdrop and intercept sensitive communications by monitoring keystrokes, e-mail and Internet communications. This monitoring may lead to the compromise of sensitive information, including user IDs and passwords.
* Providing attackers the ability to control corporate computers to send unsolicited “junk” e-mail (SPAM) or malicious software (Malware), or to perform denial of service (DoS) attacks against other organizations.
* Draining system resources and productivity and consuming system resources, even when the user is not browsing the Internet, such as when adware1 results in voluminous unwanted pop-up advertisements.
* Compromising the bank’s ability to conduct business by disrupting Internet connections as a result of the improper removal of spyware.
* Increasing the incidence of SPAM to corporate e-mail accounts.

Certain types of spyware route all Internet communications through their own servers, often without the user’s knowledge. This allows a third party to read sensitive Internet communications even when Secure Socket Layer (SSL) or other encryption protocols are used.
* Compromising confidentiality. Other forms of spyware install an application on the user’s computer that monitors and records all Internet communications and sends the report back to the originator. Identity thieves may then impersonate the customer using the IDs and passwords collected.
* Phishing seeks to lure a user to a spoofed Web site using an e-mail that appears to come from a legitimate site.

Some of the Recommended Actions
* Ensuring that user settings are set to prompt the user whenever a Web site tries to install a new program or Active X control.2 If possible, configure the browser to reject Active X controls to lessen the likelihood that spyware could be installed on computers through normal Internet browsing. Some spyware installs its own trusted certificates allowing it to intercept secure Internet communications or the execution of malicious code.
* Analyzing firewall logs to determine whether a significant number of customers are connecting to Internet banking Web sites using the same Internet address.
* Investigating the implementation of multi-factor authentication methods, which would limit the ability of identity thieves to compromise customer accounts, even when a thief has a customer’s ID, password and account numbers.
* Adjusting browser settings to prompt the user whenever a Web site tries to install a new program or Active-X control.

http://bankinfosecurity.com/node/2566

Read more

Web security – what’s that?

Posted on September 12, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

From the customer not understanding the relevance of security, through to the web developers not understanding the power of the technologies they are using, it’s hardly surprising 97% don’t make the grade. Ask most small businesses how important web site security might be, and there will be much shrugging of shoulders as they explain that they don’t handle credit card data so must be safe.

1. More and more criminals are using hacking as a way of committing their crimes in relative safety. Hacking can no longer be thought of as simple “vandalism”, it’s rapidly turning into a tool of the trade.
2. Identity theft is turning into a more lucrative line of business for many criminals than credit card fraud. And you’d be surprised just how many small business web sites collect valuable customer data – data which could easily be re-used to commit identity fraud. In one recent example, we reviewed the security of a recruitment company who had just spent a small fortune on a website with sophisticated functionality that allowed the user to manage their “account details” online.

Which brings me on to another major cause of poor security – bad design. Often naive developers with little experience of “real world” applications working to tight budgets often turn to the Internet to get the answers they need – and end up producing applications riddled with errors, bugs and security loopholes. And of course hackers are becoming increasingly sophisticated at detecting and exploiting flaws in the very programming that makes up a web site. And they use that knowledge against unsuspecting businesses with relative ease.

So how should a small business, with a limited budget and even more limited understanding of web technology get a foothold onto the Internet which is relatively safe?

1. Understand the importance of keeping any form of customer data
2. When choosing web developers, remember that you really do get what you pay for.
3. Don’t be too ambitious
4. Consider buying an off-the-shelf solution
5. Cnsider getting the site independently “penetration” tested. This may be expensive (perhaps 10-20% of the total cost of the site) but will be a fraction of the cost of a real-life break-in.

http://www.ebcvg.com/articles.php?id=879

Read more

Does E-mail Retention Require Your Attention?

Posted on September 9, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

Therefore, monitoring and storing this mountain of content can easily seem like an overwhelming project to begin and maintain for corporations and banks alike. While it is has long been accepted that an employee’s corporate e-mail account is not protected under personal property laws, I do not believe that employees ever thought that their everyday banter would ever be neatly filed pending the possibility of future reference. Sarbanes Oxley (SOX) regulations may cause security auditors and data management professionals to move even the ever popular one-line emails to the filing cabinet.

This is because although emails are informal in nature, electronic documents are as legally binding as hard copy communications. Already, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires all private brokerage houses and banks to save hard copy, email, and instant messenger communications in regard to any stock trade or investment which occurred within the past 3 years. This SEC retention of records statute (section 17a-4) has been continuously adjusted, added too, and enforced since 1939. These regulations were originally established to help assure that brokers did not raise their commission rates or become involved in investment fraud.

This need was stemmed by notable court cases such as Morgan Stanley V. Ronald Perelman (Revlon), a case which has already pushed Morgan Stanley ahead of the curve in saving all of their communications, and cost them somewhere in the ballpark of 1.45 billion dollars. Morgan Stanley is now leading the way in these practices in hope of avoiding further litigation and fines for not having proper email retention policies in place. Many entities are looking for the most cost effective services possible when beginning this process and this search has pointed towards hierarchical storage management services.

http://bankinfosecurity.com/node/2570

Read more

E-banking security provokes fear or indifference

Posted on September 9, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

Based on responses to its survey, Forrester concludes that an estimated 600,000 from a total of 15m subscribers have ditched online banking as a direct result of security fears.

Measures to restrict the functionality of some accounts (for example controlling how much money can be transferred on any day), stronger internet banking authentication and improved customer profiling are also needed to defend against security threats, it advises.

http://www.securityfocus.com/news/11305

Read more

Symantec Plugs DoS Flaws in Brightmail

Posted on September 8, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

The company warned users of the Symantec Brightmail AntiSpam 6.x to upgrade immediately to protect against remote attacks. Security alerts aggregator Secunia Inc. rates the flaws as “moderately critical” and recommended that users apply Symantec’s Patch 157 (Zip file).

The first bug is described as an error in the anti-virus program when scanning or cleaning certain messages. The error occurs, for example, when scanning messages containing deeply nested zip files and may be exploited to cause Brightmail to process the messages for an extended period of time.

A second error in the decomposer occurs when processing messages containing winmail.dat objects embedded in a MIME file. A malicious attacker may exploit this flaw to crash the decomposer, Symantec acknowledged.

It is the second time this year that Symantec has rushed out security fixes for holes in the Brightmail program. Back in June, the company shipped a Brightmail upgrade to fix an error in the static database administration password, which could be exploited to gain administrative access to the database containing quarantined messages for review.

Symantec acquired Brightmail for approximately $370 million in cash last May with long-term plans to integrate the anti-spam software into its own family of gateway appliances.

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1856717,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03129TX1K0000614

Read more

VOIP Pushes the Security Market

Posted on September 7, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

“Traditional firewall technologies can complicate several aspects of VoIP, most notably dynamic port trafficking and Network Address Translation (NAT) transversal,” says Victoria Fodale, In-Stat analyst.

“Security product vendors are adding functions that address voice applications in their products, but, as history has shown, security typically lags behind advances in technology.”

http://www.ebcvg.com/articles.php?id=876

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 275
  • 276
  • 277
  • 278
  • 279
  • 280
  • 281
  • …
  • 421
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme