Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Category: Blogging

So, what is a crisis or incident team? (Part 2 in the Crisis Team Series)

Posted on November 5, 2010December 30, 2021 by admini

Paul’s definition of a crisis response team (if we have to keep calling it that (to justify the budget)) is:

An operational capability that allows an organization to quickly initiate, track and coordinate the capabilities of multiple groups and individuals, with the single focused goal of solving an immediate business impacting event, quickly and effectively.

Business Impacting Event? Sometimes, we fail to leverage the abilities of an incident Response capability due to the fact that we view them as only useful during an IT security incident. They can be, and should be leveraged beyond that myopic vision of the role.

[Sidebar: This “pigeon holing” of security is a common problem that I have encountered in my career as a security professional. Security team can easily become isolated and out of touch of, due to the fact that the teams act as superior or independent of the rest of the organization. Misunderstanding, mistrust, “snobbishness” and general lack of communication are typical symptoms that I have encountered when called upon to fix, from everyone else’s perspective, a dysfunctional security team. Security is not a standalone capability, especially in today’s world, and needs to be integrated into the rest of the organizations.]

To create this change, we have to start at the individual level. To help create the capability, and to break down the barriers of stagnant traditional security models, I believe that a security professional needs to have a broader view of the world, encompassing not the only viruses, vulnerabilities, and hackers but also business impacting events or perspectives.

By adopting this approach, crisis response teams can provide valuable services across an organization. Crisis response teams should not be only be involved in an IT incident but they can help in situations dealing with the handling of a sensitive business events or geo-political situations. A good incident response team has the maturity and capabilities to handling these delicate situations with the aplomb required to bring about an effective resolution.

So what does the crisis response team do? To be successful in responding to these situations, requires the coordination and cooperation of multiple teams and individuals. And that is what drives how I define an incident and thats what a crisis team should be focused on as one of its primary objectives. it is driving forward to resolution with a fast ,multi-team coordinated response.

It is the last part of the sentence that really resonates with me. I almost want to change the name from crisis response to coordinated group adverse business event response team (but GABERT is a bit too long as an acronym).

I have had great success in supporting small and large organizations in many crisis situations where the capabilities and preparedness of the crisis response team have been leveraged.

So change the perceptions. It helps if people don’t view the IR team as a set of strange talking geeks, who only like IT and hacking. I can tell you that the majority of the IT security industry is very gregarious, and we don’t hide out in hidden cubicle with no light, despite how Hollywood might like to portray. Some of us even have sun tans.

So what do you think? Is this too ambitious, or outside the scope of IT security? Or could this approach add value to your organization and help expand the understanding and integration of the security team?

In the next article, we will talk about the principles goals and requirements around the culture of a crisis response team.

Read more

A new series of blog posts on Crisis Response

Posted on November 2, 2010December 30, 2021 by admini

I have been through a quite few crisis with large and small organizations and I hope that these posts will help IT teams protect their people, the world and the businesses.

Why would I write a set of blog entries about crisis response? Well to be honest, I am hoping that I can generate business opportunities, and also create a online resource of information about this very important capability. I have searched across the web and found very few sites dedicated to this subject. Yes, you can find information on disaster response but I think organizations are facing few disasters (hopefully), but probably everyone has a couple of crises a year.

So let’s start. For me, crisis response is an operational capability that needs to exercised frequently, as opposed to once a year. It goes beyond the traditional world of viruses and hack attacks. It’s something that can be leveraged to help an IT organization with it’s daily activities, not just when things are going wrong.

Hopefully, you will find this information useful.

And if you want to provide feedback, I have a forums section just for crisis response. No person is an island and it is only through sharing of knowledge and experience, that we evolve.

Now, I have become a bit of a pain when it comes to posting. I need you register and I promise not to share your email with anyone else. I will also sometimes check to see whether the person registering is really a professional. And I won’t use the email for any marketing or profiteering. If you want to talk business with me, contact me.

Thanks Paul

Read more

Storm Lingers Over Cloud Movement

Posted on February 20, 2009December 30, 2021 by admini

Well, for one thing we can deduce that on the highest levels of IT management, security priorities still take precedence over the opportunity for cost-savings – since one of the biggest advantages promised by cloud computing is the ability to offload the expense of staffing and maintaining your own data centers. Simply put, organizations just aren’t yet willing to trust some cloud services provider with every element of IT systems management. If anything, the people surveyed know best how hard they’ve been working to keep an eye on their own stuff and obviously have to wonder if a service provider will care as much.

As far back as 2007, SaaS market leader Salesforce.com confirmed that malware and phishing attacks being aimed at its customers had resulted from an incident involving one of its employees who was themselves swept up in a phishing scam and exposed the hosted applications vendor’s own customer database.

On the flip side, if liability is transferred to the provider, the ongoing move to approach IT security strategy from the perspective of risk management could benefit cloud adoption. For, if a company can offload a good deal of its risk onto service providers, for things like electronic data breaches, it would seem like that might make sense, especially if courts will allow companies to pass off the blame on hosted services providers when security breaches inevitably occur.

http://securitywatch.eweek.com/phishing_and_fraud/storm_lingers_over_cloud_movement.html

Read more

Banks: Losses From Computer Intrusions Up in 2007

Posted on February 24, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

SARs are federally mandated write-ups that banks are required to file anytime they spot a suspicious or fraudulent transaction that amounts to $5,000 or more.

While the number of reported computer intrusion-related SARs (536) paled in comparison to the leading SARs categories – mortgage loan fraud (12,554) and check fraud (17,558) – the FDIC said financial crime aided by computer intrusions is growing at a rapid pace. Further, it noted that the mean (average) loss per SAR from computer intrusions was roughly $29,630 — almost triple the estimated loss per SAR during the same time period in 2006 ($10,536).

Manning notes in his book that for the purposes of this reporting requirement, computer intrusion does not mean attempted intrusions of Web sites or other non-critical information systems of the institution that provide no access to institution or customer financial or other critical information.

Anyway, back to the interesting bits: The report indicates that in most cases, banks are at a loss to say exactly how cyber crooks are stealing the funds. The report indicates that the 80 percent of the computer intrusions were classified as “unknown unauthorized access – online banking,” and that “unknown unauthorized access to online banking has risen from 10 to 63 percent in the past year.” Still, the FDIC indicates that a large share of the unknown losses most likely resulted from malicious data-stealing programs surreptitiously installed on customer PCs by cyber crooks.

Security Fix has written about this series of attacks spoofing the BBB, as well as a similarly successful spear phishing malware attacks that spoofed the Federal Trade Commission.

Of those computer intrusion-related SARs that were identified, online bill payment applications were most frequently targeted by cyber thieves, the FDIC found. However, unauthorized access to wire transfers and automated clearinghouse (ACH) payments caused the most losses to financial institutions in the computer intrusion category, mainly because ACH and wire transfers give the banks less time to detect and recover from unauthorized access.

Another case study cites an unnamed financial institution that had 14 customer account takeovers as a result of spyware infestations that recorded keystrokes on customer PCs, stolen credentials that allowed the crooks to initiate a series of fraudulent ACH transfers out of the victims’ corporate accounts into accounts set up and controlled by the attackers.

Avivah Litan, a financial fraud analyst with Gartner Inc., said unauthorized wire transfers disproportionately impact small to medium sized businesses that may be using online banking but do not have the same stringent financial controls in place at many larger corporations.

Fewer retailer payment card data breaches during the quarter caused lower losses to financial institutions. Retailers are resisting payment card industry (PCI) data security standards, which could lead to lower compliance, additional breaches, and more counterfeit card losses absorbed by card-issuing institutions.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2008/02/banks_losses_from_computer_int.html#more

Read more

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme