Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Category: Financial

Firms: Don’t expect federated IDs soon

Posted on February 16, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Some security and e-commerce companies have touted a future where consumers can sign in once and use that federated authentication throughout the commercial Web. In the past, Microsoft has tried to turn its Passport online identity system into the backend authentication system for e-commerce providers, but privacy experts worried that the move would give a single company too much power in managing consumer information.

http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/141?ref=rss

Read more

FBI makes connections in data breach case

Posted on February 10, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

On Friday, the paper reported that as many as 200,000 debit-card holders could be affected. “I’ve not seen debit cards stolen like this,” Clements said. “Quite frankly, this is the first piece of the puzzle hackers need to commit full-blown identity theft on consumers.”

http://news.com.com/FBI+makes+connections+in+data+breach+case/2100-1029_3-6038287.html?tag=nefd.hed

Read more

What’s Next For The FTC And Net Threats?

Posted on February 10, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Spam? Spyware? Data breaches? Telephone records confidentiality? Old issues. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairman Deborah Platt Majoras wants to know what’s next. Majoras said the FTC plans hearings some time this fall to ponder the next generation of consumer high-tech threats. “At these hearings, we will address a series of critical questions: What have we learned over the past decade? How can we apply those lessons to what we do know, and what we cannot know, as we look to the future?” She said the focus of the hearings will be how best to protect consumers in the virtual marketplace of the future.

“A decade has passed since the FTC held hearings to identity significant consumer protection issues associated with new technologies,” Majoras told a Washington spyware conference. “It is again time to look ahead and examine the next generation of issues to emerge in our high-tech global marketplace.”

Majoras noted that the FTC held similar hearings in 1995. At that conference, more than 70 experts in business, technology, economics and consumer protection analyzed the consumer protection challenges likely to emerge in the late 1990s and early 21st century. “No one even mentioned spyware or similar intrusive software,” she said. “Today, however, spyware is fast overtaking spam as consumers’ top online concern.” She did concede that the hearing participants were unaware of the emergence of spyware. “Ten years now is an eternity for technology, and the technological underpinnings for spyware were just being developed at about the time of the FTC’s hearings.”

Although the 1995 FTC panel missed spyware as an emerging threat, Majoras said four principal lessons from the conference are still relevant.

“First, we must study and evaluate new technologies so that we are as prepared as possible to deal with harmful, collateral developments,” Majoras said. “Second, we need to bring appropriate law enforcement actions to reaffirm that fundamental principles of FTC law apply in the context of new technologies.” Majoras said the third principal lesson is that the FTC must look to private enterprise to implement self-regulatory regimes and “more importantly, to develop new technologies.” Finally, she said, the FTC needs to educate consumers so that they can take the necessary steps to protect themselves.

“It is again time to look ahead and examine the next generation of issues to emerge in our high-tech global marketplace,” Majoras said.

http://www.internetnews.com/xSP/article.php/3584391

Read more

Big Banks Ally for Data Security Program

Posted on February 1, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

“Third-party providers are providing some information, but financial institutions are using their own resources to continue” seeking additional information on a broad array of security details, according to Faith Boettger, a senior consultant to BITS, the industry group behind the project.

The effort is aimed at making it easier on both sides: for the financial institutions that need the information, and for the service providers that are getting deluged with invariably disparate and often redundant requests. The new policy won’t just touch on what level of encryption providers put on data or what security protects databases that contain customer information, although those are two of the granular details it will touch on. The group is putting together a standardized questionnaire that will touch on service providers’ security policy, asset classification and control, personnel security, physical and environmental security, communications and operations management, access control, system development and maintenance, business continuity and regulatory issues.

Priscilla Rabbayres, a global regulatory executive in the financial services sector for IBM, told eWEEK that IBM considers the financial institutions’ efforts to be of “enormous importance,” particularly given the times. “If we look back even a year ago, this was an important issue, but it really came to life with the California legislation of 2003 [that required enterprises to inform customers of security breaches],” she said. “One service provider may look at one standard, another at another aspect,” she said.

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1917900,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594

Read more

Fear of fraud hampers UK online banking

Posted on January 22, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Five per cent of online bankers have no security software installed on their PC at all. The most common reasons cited include that it is too expensive, that they don’t need it or they don’t understand what it is.
Many banks’ terms and conditions reflect the voluntary Banking Code. The current edition, published March 2005, tells users to use up-to-date anti-virus and spyware software and a personal firewall.

But the FSA found that nearly all users (95 per cent) surveyed believe that at least some security responsibility should lie with the bank while 45 per cent believe banks should take sole responsibility.

According to APACS, the UK payment association, fraud losses through internet banking were £14.5m in the six months to June 2005. Although this is relatively low, losses have more than trebled since the same period in 2004 (£4m). The FSA’s research found that if banks were to tackle these losses by shifting the liability fully towards the consumer, more than three quarters (77 per cent) of users say they would abandon internet banking.

“Most consumers recognise they have some responsibility for security but they are not necessarily following this obligation through,” said Philip Robinson, Financial Crime Sector Leader at the FSA. “To tackle the losses associated with fraud, banks should continue to drive security and this must include educating consumers on the importance of protecting themselves. We recognise that many banks are already taking steps to engage consumers. Initiatives like the ‘Get Safe Online’ campaign between the Government and the private sector show consumer education is beginning to happen. But banks need to look carefully at consumer attitudes and whether their initiatives are effective in maintaining confidence,” he added.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/01/23/online_banking_fraud_fears/

Read more

BANK SECRECY ACT Sharing Suspicious Activity Reports With Controlling Companies

Posted on January 20, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

* A controlling company includes a bank or savings association holding company, or a company having the power directly or indirectly to direct the management or policies of an industrial loan company or a parent company, or to vote 25 percent or more of any class of voting shares of an industrial loan company or a parent company.

* Sharing a SAR within an organization is allowable for the head office, or for the controlling entity or party to discharge its oversight responsibilities with respect to enterprise-wide risk management and compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

* Accordingly, a bank or savings association (depository institution) may disclose a SAR to its controlling company(ies), whether domestic or foreign; and a U.S. branch or agency of a foreign bank may disclose a SAR to its head office outside the United States.

* Depository institutions, as part of their anti-money laundering program, must have written confidentiality agreements or arrangements, and proper internal controls in place to protect the confidentiality of the SAR.

http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/regulations.php?reg_id=140&PHPSESSID=dc6f96a8b3806f79be541fd18aa9c5a7

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • …
  • 17
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme