Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Category: Product

TruSecure delivers custom bug alerts

Posted on January 26, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

The service, dubbed the IntelliShield Early Warning System, delivers information from TruSecure’s vulnerability-warning service to a device connected to a customer’s network.

The device then looks at the data on the network, gauges what effect the security flaw could have on it, and alerts information technology staff, depending on the level of threat.

The TruSecure service is the latest in a series of services launched to help companies determine how vulnerable their networks are to new security flaws. Other companies, including Qualys and Symantec, send out information on the latest security flaws to enterprise customers. However, those subscription service companies don’t tell managers whether the system affected by the flaw is a critical one, said Matthew Kovar, director of security solutions and services at analyst firm The Yankee Group.

More info: [url=http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5147432.html]http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5147432.html[/url]

Read more

Comparison of feature sets from different virus vendors

Posted on January 25, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

[url=http://img.com.com//i/tr/contentHTML/r00620040113bxr01_01.htm]http://img.com.com//i/tr/contentHTML/r00620040113bxr01_01.htm[/url]

Read more

Mutating software could predict hacker attacks

Posted on January 25, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

But now software engineers at Icosystem in Cambridge, Massachusetts, have developed a program that can predict what is coming next by “evolving” future hacker and virus attacks based on information from known ones.

The idea would be to generate these novel attack strategies centrally, then remotely update the intrusion-detection software protecting PCs and networks around the world. It works by mutating the short programs or “scripts” that hackers use to invade computers or which they plant on them for later activation. The result is artificially created hacking routines that security systems could be taught to recognise, allowing them to defend networks against previously unseen attacks.

More info: [url=http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994588]http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994588[/url]

Read more

Check Point launches dewormer for internal networks

Posted on January 20, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

Nick Lowe, Check Point director for Northern Europe, says his firm’s approach scores over Cisco’s Network Admission Control program by avoiding the need to install client software.

InterSpect appliances are based on Check Point’s Stateful Inspection and Application Intelligence technologies and designed specifically to inspect the protocols and applications used on internal networks.

According to Check Point, InterSpect is better than products designed for perimeter security within Intranet environments because of its greater awareness of internal applications and protocols (such as database protocol SQL).

More info: [url=http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/35003.html]http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/35003.html[/url]

Read more

Target-based IDS muffles the noise to take aim on the alerts that count

Posted on January 14, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

Most commercial NIDSes depend on attack signatures to identify malicious or out-of-policy activity. Signature-based NIDS is a very CPU-intensive technology. Before comparing packets against the NIDS database of a thousand or more signatures, the sensors also have to perform a variety of compute-intensive operations such as HTTP normalization, converting URLs in HTTP data streams to a canonical format so that they can be compared against a list of known bad traffic. To keep from losing packets, NIDS signature writers generally only match against the minimum amount of data needed to validate an attack.

Some IDS vendors are working on making their signature and detection engines smarter, but others are taking a different path: target-based IDS. Take additional information about systems and change the signal-to-noise ratio to increase the signal and decrease the noise. You’d still get an alert for an attack packet, but if the attack were simply noise, the alert would be given a low priority.

Early entries in this field include Tenable Network Security’s Lightning Console, Cisco Systems’ Cisco Threat Response (CTR) and Internet Security Systems’ Fusion. These products combine traditional network scanning and vulnerability analysis with IDS alerting consoles. They all take in the raw alerts from your IDS consoles, but they “qualify” each alert based on whether your system is actually vulnerable.

The result: Far fewer alerts and analysis in minutes instead of hours.

This article takes a look at the nature of the beast these new tools are trying to tame.

More info: [url=http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid14_gci944401,00.html]http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid14_gci944401,00.html[/url]

Read more

Novadigm Jumps Into Utility Computing Fray

Posted on December 22, 2003December 30, 2021 by admini

Among the other Radia enhancements are a series of templates for commonly used applications that allow users to systematically provision the server applications without having to learn the intricacies of each installation and configuration. The customizable templates work with The Apache Software Foundation’s Web server; Microsoft Corp.’s Internet Information Services, Active Directory and SQL Server; BEA Systems Inc.’s WebLogic; IBM WebSphere; Sun Microsystems Inc.’s Sun ONE Directory Server; and Oracle Corp. applications on Windows, Unix and Linux.

Novadigm is also extending the suite’s platform support across operating systems, blade servers and load balancers. New native operating system installers supported include Hewlett-Packard Co.’s HP-UX Ignite, Microsoft’s Automated Deployment Services and Sun’s Solaris JumpStart. Radia Server Management also supports Intel Corp.-based blade servers from IBM, HP and Dell Inc., and it is integrated with load balancers from F5 Networks Inc. and Cisco Systems Inc.

More info: [url=http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,1419832,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594 ]http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,1419832,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594[/url]

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme