Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Category: Statistics

Top internal network threats in 2008 so far

Posted on July 24, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

Promisec announced its findings from security audits of more than 100,000 corporate endpoints.

These audits were conducted in the first six months of 2008 in enterprises of different sizes and revealed that not even one organization was completely clean from internal threats, and the minimum number of threats found was three.

http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=6350

Read more

Website infection rate three times faster than 2007

Posted on July 23, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

Hackers both set up malicious blogs on the service, and inject dangerous web links and content into innocent blogs in the form of comments.

Blogspot.com accounts for 2 percent of all of the world’s malware hosted on the web.

http://www.net-security.org/malware_news.php?id=962

Read more

Increasing threat of confidential information loss

Posted on July 17, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

Respondents also reported additional business costs from compromised security, including: Loss of productivity — 61 percent in 2008 compared to 52 percent in 2006.

The CA survey results show there has been significant time and IT budget spent on IT security compliance to help meet regulations and mitigate future risk. The survey results point to Identity Access and Management (IAM) solutions as a key and growing area of security investment by large U.S. organizations. Survey respondents indicate that more than 85 percent of large U.S. organizations are using an IAM solution, with 75 percent of those organizations planning to make further IAM investments within the next 12 months.

http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=6333

Read more

2008 Security Survey: We’re Spending More, But Data’s No Safer Than Last Year

Posted on June 29, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

Sixty-six percent of respondents say their vulnerability to breaches and malicious code attacks is either the same as last year or worse.

Since when is “no worse than before” an acceptable return on investment? The solution lies in securing to specific threats. The problem is that IT lags well behind other disciplines in adopting systematic risk management processes. But those technology professionals who have made the leap into classifying IT assets, assigning values, evaluating threats, then determining where and how to mitigate risk find the process to be extremely valuable. In short, risk management principles bring rigor to information security.

Here’s one illustration from our security study of how risk management can focus companies on the most important threats: Insecure coding practices are a pox on all our houses.

Roughly half of respondents whose organizations have risk management plans in place specify security features at the time of application design.

Of those without risk management plans, just 22% focus on code security.

We need the jolt that this security study provides.

Twenty-one percent of companies never conduct security risk assessments, and of those that do, just one in five imposes the rigor of using a specialized external auditor.

This despite 63% contending with government or industry regulations related to data security, many of which don’t give adequate guidance on how to comply. Best practices are the best defense in such gray areas.
mployee data.

We had hoped that the ongoing parade of high-profile data losses would set most companies on the road to comprehensive privacy protection. So we were discouraged that the only actions to safeguard customer data that are used by more than half of companies are … informing employees of standards and putting a privacy policy on the Web site.

Fine steps, but they don’t exclude the need for encryption (used by 34%) or privacy policy audits (25%). Amazingly, 11% say they have no privacy safeguards for customer data.

We could go on, and we will. But we need to stop for a second and ask, what gives?

WHAT DO WE GET FOR THE MONEY?
There’s no blaming the financial powers that be. For nearly 30% of respondents, security accounts for at least 11% of the total IT budget.

The bad news: Viruses, phishing attacks, and worms continue to cause headaches, and companies keep pouring money into firewalls and antivirus protection.

Speculation that these product categories would fade away, or at least be assimilated into other technologies, is premature, as 13% say their vulnerability to breaches and malicious code is even worse than last year.
And they’re the only two product categories rated as effective by more than half of respondents.

Complexity, cited as the biggest security challenge by 62% of respondents. More data is ending up on the network. More agents are running on company computers, and employees expect some control over the PCs they use. As travel and energy costs skyrocket, companies are increasing the use of branch offices and teleworkers, a trend that spreads data far and wide as people expect to work securely from customer sites, home, or the coffee shop down the street. Complexity also stems from juggling multiple compliance requirements, training and educating staff and users in security awareness, and coping with increasing technical sophistication of networks.

Most organizations–63%–must comply with one or more government or industry regulations, many of them vaguely worded and offering little guidance on translating requirements into technology. To meet compliance goals, Kevin Sanchez Cherry, information systems security office program manager with a U.S. government department, says he applies best practices, which he determines by consulting a variety of sources, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the SANS Institute, and colleagues facing similar challenges.

Electric Insurance spends about 20% to 25% of its project planning time on risk analysis and management, says Michael Hannigan, manager of systems engineering and support. Because the entire process, from planning to postproduction, includes risk analysis, Hannigan finds potential problems are identified and addressed early.

Risk assessments primarily are used to develop mitigation policies and fix vulnerabilities; that can yield process-oriented efficiencies, such as leveraging databases to simplify asset management and policy compliance.

http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/management/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=TVNSCDTAPU452QSNDLPSKHSCJUNN2JVN?articleID=208800942

Read more

81% of corporate PCs lack antivirus, firewall or patches

Posted on June 20, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

Sophos collected data from more than 580 PCs worldwide, 36 percent coming from UK-based computers, and found: 81 percent of corporate endpoints tested failed one or more of these basic tests 63 percent were missing at least one Microsoft security patch among Microsoft Windows operating system, Microsoft Office, Microsoft Internet Explorer, Microsoft Media Player or Flash Player 51 percent of endpoints tested had their client firewalls disabled 15 percent were running out-of date endpoint security software or had disabled their protection altogether Administrators reading these stats might think they are sitting pretty and have nothing to worry about, but I would challenge them to run this free tool and double check the security levels within their network — the findings have been staggering.

Rather than wait for a problem to arise and be forced to perform a post mortem to find the holes, administrators would be wise to take a few minutes now — it’s free, it’s easy and it might just highlight some serious vulnerabilities that can be addressed proactively.

Sophos collected data from 583 corporate endpoints for this Endpoint Assessment Test — North America represented 39 percent of the sample base, the UK made up 36 percent, while Australia and Germany contributed 11 percent and 9 percent respectively.

http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=6244

Read more

When it comes to data security breaches, the general public doesn’t need to know

Posted on June 12, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

E-mail is the most popular method of transferring confidential data (over 70% allow staff to transfer confidential data via e-mail), and yet over a quarter of businesses (26%) admit to losing data via e-mail.

While the threat of data loss or breach continues to increase, there are still organizations that have not invested in data security.

Respondents indicated the following as the top three reasons why: 21 percent feel that data loss prevention is not a security threat, 37 percent do not have the budget to invest in data loss prevention solutions, and 16 percent trust their employees to follow the corporate policy.

When asked about the possible impact of data breach notification legislation, 49 percent of respondents that do not currently adhere to data breach notification legislation envision their annual IT spend increasing by at least 10 percent. In comparison, only one in five (20%) respondents who currently adhere to data breach notification legislation said they have seen no change in their IT spending since the legislation’s introduction.

http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=6222

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • …
  • 45
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme