Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Category: Uncategorized

Handling Incident Management in a Virtualized Environment

Posted on August 20, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

… however, this is still reason for concern: a large majority of reported vulnerabilities allow an attacker to gain full control of a single hardware platform’s multi-server environment. Consequently, a close look at detection, containment, and response capabilities for the unique needs of VMs is an important step in integrating virtualization into the organization’s security program.

It is in this phase of incident management, security and infrastructure design teams address the unique challenges associated with virtualization.

A few simple steps – not always so simple to implement – will ensure an organization’s ability to detect unwanted behavior and effectively respond as virtual servers spread across the enterprise, including:

For example, critical or high-value breach targets might reside on a host with more than the recommended two NICs (one for partition management and one for VMs to access the physical network).

Implemented using VLANs configured in a virtual switch and VLAN access control lists (VACLs), this example is one way to help ensure unwanted traffic does not pass from a compromised VM to other VMs on the same host.

Remember that many controls you implement on the physical network must be configured in virtual environments, but VMs are by design isolated from controls on your physical network.

Security teams often face two challenges when trying to remove a physical server from service: retention of potential evidence in volatile storage or removal of a device from a critical business process.

For example, removing power from a server starts the process of mitigating business impact, but it also denies forensic analysis of data, processes, keys, and possible footprints left by an attacker. A VMware snapshot is a point-in-time image of a VM, including RAM and the virtual machine disk file (Siebert, 2011). Administrators typically strive to meet four goals when a virtual server is removed from service: 1) contain a breach or malware infestation by removing the affected server from the network; 2) prevent any further damage to, or loss of, information residing on local storage; 3) remove the server to a secure location for forensics analysis; and 4) restore services provided by the VM.

As I wrote in Step 3: Segment virtual networks, this is easily accomplished using documented steps to isolate one or more virtual network segments.

They examine and help remedy system, network, and process design challenges associated with VM placement, incident detection and containment, and business process recovery unique to virtualization.

Link: http://virtualization.sys-con.com/node/2760475

Read more

Security incident response procedures: When to do a system shutdown

Posted on August 17, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

Shutting down a system in response to an information security incident is arguably the most drastic option that can be taken, but it might be the best option in certain scenarios.

For example, if there were a possibility that an attacker could gain control of a computer system that regulates traffic lights, it would likely be best to disable that system, and thus the traffic lights, because drivers would hopefully know to treat the non-working traffic signals like stop signs.

Such a decision would also depend on the security and availability controls implemented, including if there were controls in place that limited the compromise from spreading to the complete system versus just a compromised account.

In a system that contains no sensitive data and only has availability requirements, the security team could just do a basic calculation of the cost incurred from the downtime versus the recovery cost from containing and remediating the compromised system, and then make a decision based on the numbers.

This will lead into developing a business continuity and disaster recovery plan (BCDRP), which is similar to an incident response plan in that they both need to be developed prior to an incident and periodically tested so if a shutdown becomes necessary, a playbook for dealing with the situation is on hand.

In developing the BCDRP or incident response plan, establish a channel of communication with the necessary people, including the chief information security officer, chief information officer, helpdesk, business owners and marketing so they will be able to quickly make an informed decision about potentially shutting down a system.

For example, a Web server with a Web application susceptible to an SQL injection vulnerability might be shut down while a patch is being developed, a Web application firewall is set up or the configuration is changed to remove access by the Web server to run commands on the system.

Regardless of which option is the best in a given scenario, ensuring a plan and communication channels are in place prior to an incident is critical to minimizing the impact on your organization.

Link: http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/tip/Security-incident-response-procedures-When-to-do-a-system-shutdown

Read more

Hunting for ‘Whales’ Using Targeted Malware

Posted on July 10, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

Of course, spear phishing isn’t new, but the targets and tactics are evolving, and most users who might have known to not give away their banks account numbers at home may be handing over sensitive information in an enterprise setting due to lack of training and awareness.

Administrative assistants, accountants, salesmen, IT managers, and pretty much everyone else in an enterprise hold a great deal of company knowledge that criminals can use to ultimately unlock a company’s secrets.

But beyond simply explaining the threat to them, ask your staff to take a step back to see what information a cyber criminal can easily dig up. This may sound completely narcissistic to them, but I recommend you ask them to “Google” themselves from time to time in order to see what pops up in search results. The idea is to familiarize one’s self with what is public knowledge — so you aren’t caught off guard when it’s used to gain your trust.

Even though you aren’t likely to be considered a “whale” by Las Vegas casino standards, you and your staff need to understand that your position within a large organization probably makes you a pretty big fish in the eyes of a cyber criminal. And in order to help combat against these attempts, your best bet is to try and see what a hacker can see on the Internet so it can’t be used against you

Link: http://www.enterpriseefficiency.com/author.asp?section_id=1076&doc_id=265441&f_src=enterpriseefficiency_iwkfeed

Read more

RSA’s Art Coviello points to Big Data approach to combat cyber security challenges

Posted on June 5, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

An intelligence-driven security model, on the other hand, leverages Big Data analytics for pervasive monitoring, threat information sharing and intelligent controls and is designed to allow for more rapid detection of attacks and shortening an attacker’s dwell time within a breached enterprise. He said, “The ongoing expansion of the attack surface and the escalation in the threat environment require urgent action, there must be a sense of urgency to understand the security implications in everything we do so that we develop and implement the right security model.”

Create a transformational security strategy – Practitioners must look critically at their budgets and design a plan that transitions the existing infrastructure to an intelligence-driven approach that incorporate Big Data capabilities.

He went on to explain government’s key role of acting as a central repository to exchange pertinent security information about current threats and attacks as well as to set the tone for cooperation internationally.

The security vendors were called upon to help close the technology and skills gap for defending against attacks that has been created as a result of the growing attack surface and the escalating threat environment.

In closing he offered that these approaches can help enable the industry to manage cyber security risk to acceptable levels so that all societies around the world can reap the benefits and meet the goal of a more trusted digital world.

Link: http://www.informationweek.in/security/13-06-05/rsa_s_art_coviello_points_to_big_data_approach_to_combat_cyber_security_challenges.aspx

Read more

Understanding Risk in Real-Time: Where Will Your Next Breach Come From?

Posted on June 4, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

This is where predictive analytics come in — the same technology that an online retailer might use to better target product offers to customers based on recent buying behavior, for example. Consider a salesperson that might have the right to download an entire customer database, but if he does it at 2 a.m. on a Sunday morning from his home office, this might raise a few questions. By identifying patterns or anomalies from “normal” — and serving them up in graphical profiles — security staff have a never before seen, real-time view into potential risk.

Here’s the key point: with this new approach, risk is assessed from live data, not anticipated scenarios that have been coded into the system, alerting security staff to actions already defined as “bad.” Real-time, predictive analytics lets companies truly understand where their greatest risks lie by harnessing existing company data to sound alarms before a loss – when the risk around an individual or resource spikes.

By having a way to analyze risk associated with user access on a continuous basis, companies can truly understands who someone is, what they should access, what they are doing with that access and what patterns of behavior might represent threats. With this insight, companies will also have a better understanding of where their next breach could take place, and whether that threat is internal or external.

Link: http://www.wired.com/insights/2013/06/understanding-risk-in-real-time-where-will-your-next-breach-will-come-from/

Read more

AusCERT 2013: Visibility critical when selling IT security to execs, says Foxtel CSO

Posted on May 24, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

Everybody owns [infrastructure] when they don’t want you to touch it, but nobody owns it when it’s their bum on the line if things go wrong

Building on the MSS relationship not only allows Foxtel to be more proactive in maintaining its security posture, but supports interactions with executives who are less concerned with technical minutiae but think of IT security in terms of business risk.

Analysis of internal cost-recovery claims is a great way to marry IT-security activity to potential business change: once the IT staff know which business units are paying for what systems and services, it’s much easier to know how any potential security issue will affect which parts of the business. Everybody owns it when they don’t want you to touch it, but nobody owns it when it’s their bum on the line if things go wrong.”

Shaw has often found it’s easier for an internal security organisation to get leverage with other business units by handballing the bad news to the MSS: “it’s always effective bringing in external parties to talk to your executives,” he laughed. “Your executives are not going to give you budget unless you can marry together the value from MSS, actionable intelligence – unless you can demonstrate the value to the business and where the business is trying to go.

Link: http://www.cso.com.au/article/462775/auscert_2013_visibility_critical_when_selling_it_security_execs_says_foxtel_cso/

Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 40
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI News – Mon, 17 Nov 2025
  • CSO News – Mon, 17 Nov 2025
  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15

Archives

  • November 2025
  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2026 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme