Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Category: Uncategorized

What Is Wireless Security

Posted on March 30, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Ultimately, security is everybody’s business, and only with everyone’s cooperation and consistent practices will it be achievable. Wireless security is a work in progress, so it is essential to administer a wireless network so that it becomes more and more secure. And with more organizations focusing strongly on wireless security, we can only expect to see many more secured wireless networks in the future.

http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/security/2006/03/30/what-is-wireless-security.html

Read more

VoIP security at odds with QoS

Posted on March 21, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

“We have to follow standards and listen to news groups. Adding encryption to prevent outsiders listening into conversations can also degrade performance.

“Providing QoS to use limited bandwidth but still encrypt data limits the ability to analyse what application is running, or decide what QoS should apply, ” said Gilad Brand, director of product management at VoIP gateway specialist Jungo.

SIP is an open standard that should help to address the security versus performance issue, but vendors’ implementations of the technology differ, so interoperability and uniform feature sets are not assured in the short term, said Slaby.

http://www.vnunet.com/2152383

Read more

‘Security in the cloud’ is not the way to go

Posted on February 15, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

It is for this reason that a choice between implementing network security in the middle of the network — in the cloud — or at the endpoints is a false dichotomy. An organization had no choice but to put its firewalls, IDSs and anti-virus software inside its own network. Security would be vastly improved if the major carriers implemented cloud-based solutions, but they’re no substitute for traditional firewalls, IDSs and IPSs.

http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;1786107200;fp;16;fpid;0

Read more

Remote filtering delivers protection in the field

Posted on February 9, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

In the Stress of Security report, it was found that more than two-thirds of European IT managers leave the responsibility of managing what happens to a corporate laptop when it is out of the office in the hands of the employee.

As hackers become more ingenious in the ways they lure users into giving confidential information or downloading viruses and malware, ‘trusting’ remote workers not to misuse a corporate laptop — whether intentionally or not — is no longer an option, especially in an era when the number of mobile workers is set to rise significantly. As in the corporate environment, the most effective way of preventing remote workers from compromising the corporate IT networks with an infected laptop is to put in place safeguards that stop them visiting malicious websites, giving information away to fraudsters or downloading applications that infect the IT network and corrupt data files.

To be truly effective both inside and outside the office, an organisation’s employee Internet management policy needs to consider mobile security as much as the safety of fixed assets. New remote filtering applications can, for the first time, extend the same web filtering capabilities used in the corporate LAN to the laptop user.

Remote filtering removes the headache for IT administrators of worrying about what sites are secure or not. Once the remote filtering application is installed on a laptop, it ensures that every time a request is made to visit a website, a second request is sent back to the corporate system to determine if access is allowed.

Everyone understands laptops pose a problem but until now there has not been a suitable technology solution available to use that did not deplete bandwidth or slow down the network.

http://www.it-observer.com/articles/1060/remote_filtering_delivers_protection_field/

Read more

Best Practices for Control System Security

Posted on February 2, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Best practices should include:
– Host-based protection.
– Real-time prevention decisions.
– Defense in depth.
– Real-time correlation.
– Behavioral approach.
– Flexibility.
– Ease of deployment.
– Centralized event management.
– Platform coverage.
– Administration.

http://www.cioupdate.com/article.php/3582536

Read more

Gartner Says Don’t Deploy 802.11n until 2007

Posted on January 27, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

VBroadcom and Marvell have already announced that they will start producing ‘draft-compliant’ chipsets, but Gartner labelled these claims as “misleading” and “premature”.

The analyst firm believes that the technology is likely to be changed before a final standard is approved, and that additional testing will be required to ensure compatibility with existing Wi-Fi standards.

http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2149265/gartner-pleads-restraint-802

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • …
  • 40
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme