Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Category: Uncategorized

Address proper facilities in your disaster recovery plan

Posted on November 16, 2003December 30, 2021 by admini

To secure the appropriate space, you’ll need to work closely with the people who are responsible for facilities management in your organization. As long as the locations are well outside the line-of-sight horizon, you can shore up these facilities with extra power and air conditioning, allowing them to find new life as backup data centers.

Or look for new facilities that your company has acquired as a result of mergers or takeovers to house the data centers for DR operations. In many cases, you can find floor space already configured to run data operations, since the acquired company most likely has data centers for its operations that won’t be necessary after the merger is complete.

You can also obtain dedicated space in a colocation facility, along with space to house vital employees during an emergency. The downside is that your company may share this reserve space with multiple companies, operating under the idea that only one of the companies will fail over at any give time.

If the first two options aren’t viable, consider working with another company to share data center space so that both organizations have a location for failover.

No matter how you secure space to house your DR failover, it’s a necessary step in your business continuity planning process.

More info: [url=http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/Address_proper_facilities_in_your_disaster_recovery_plan.html?tag=tu.scblog.6673]http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/Address_proper_facilities_in_your_disaster_recovery_plan.html?tag=tu.scblog.6673[/url]

Read more

Security CIRTs must be a certainty

Posted on November 11, 2003December 30, 2021 by admini

Others that are not obligated to have them may question whether they need a formal CIRT. Those companies believe there is in-house expertise to sort out incidents, but they should ask themselves whether there is a system to alert the necessary people when an incident occurs.

The first job for a CIRT is to assess the scope of damage and figure out how to lessen it, not necessarily gather evidence. The optimal CIRT would consist of core members from IT auditing, information security and corporate security, in additional to the legal department. Each group brings a different skill set to the team. “If someone questions the CIRT team’s response, then the auditor will make sure the report is auditable,” Poulios said. As such, they should probably handle the evidence gathering so the chain of custody is preserved.

More info: [url=http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid14_gci935950,00.html]http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid14_gci935950,00.html[/url]

Read more

Wireless Intrusion Detection Systems

Posted on November 5, 2003December 30, 2021 by admini

Security issues ranging from misconfigured wireless access points (WAPs) to session hijacking to Denial of Service (DoS) can plague a WLAN.

Wireless networks are not only susceptible to TCP/IP-based attacks native to wired networks, they are also subject to a wide array of 802.11-specific threats.

The standard 802.11 encryption method, Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) is weak.

Rogue WAPs can also be introduced by users.

The point is that the threats are real, they can cause extensive damage, and they are becoming more prevalent as the 802.11 technology grows in popularity.

Without some sort of detection mechanism, it can be difficult to identify the threats to a WLAN.

Traditional wired based Intrusion detection systems (IDSs) attempt to identify computer system and network intrusions and misuse by gathering and analyzing data.

More recently, IDSs have been developed for use on wireless networks. These wireless IDSs can monitor and analyze user and system activities, recognize patterns of known attacks, identify abnormal network activity, and detect policy violations for WLANs.

Wireless IDSs gather all local wireless transmissions and generate alerts based either on predefined signatures or on anomalies in the traffic. A Wireless IDS is similar to a standard, wired IDS, but has additional deployment requirements as well as some unique features specific to WLAN intrusion and misuse detection.

A centralized wireless IDS is usually a combination of individual sensors which collect and forward all 802.11 data to a central management system, where the wireless IDS data is stored and processed.

[url=http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1742]http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1742[/url]

Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40

Recent Posts

  • AI News – Mon, 17 Nov 2025
  • CSO News – Mon, 17 Nov 2025
  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15

Archives

  • November 2025
  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme