Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Bank of America takes on cyberscams

Posted on May 26, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

SiteKey’s image and text checks let people know they are on an authentic Bank of America Web site and also verify the identity of the customer, the company said Wednesday. The features will be introduced first in Tennessee next month.

They will then be expanded state-by-state to become available nationwide by year’s end, said Sanjay Gupta, an electronic commerce executive at Bank of America. Use of SiteKey will be optional at first, but will be required once the introduction is complete, Gupta said. “We wanted to not only protect our customers, but give them a way to feel very safe that when they come to BankofAmerica.com that it really is BankofAmerica.com,” he said.

The features are designed to combat phishing, spoofing and spyware–three common types of online attacks that are often used together. Phishing scams, which attempt to steal sensitive information such as user names and passwords, typically use fake Web pages “spoofed” to look like legitimate sites belonging to trusted providers. Spyware is malicious software that gets surreptitiously installed on a PC and spies on the user’s actions.

In April, Bank of America’s account holders were the target of a phishing attempt, according to an example documented by the Anti-Phishing Working Group. Gupta said the financial institution has 13.2 million online customers, the most of any U.S. bank.

When people register for SiteKey, they pick an image from a list and type in their own phrase to be associated with their account. When they enter their login name and hit the SiteKey button on the Bank of America site, that same image and phrase are displayed in response, Gupta said. This verifies that the user is in fact on the real Bank of America Web site, he said.

In another feature, SiteKey links the customer’s PC to the online banking service. If the service is later accessed from a different computer, the account holder is prompted to answer one of three previously selected challenge questions. This should prevent abuse of an account even if attackers obtain the correct login credentials, Gupta said. Additional PCs, such as an office computer, can be linked to the bank’s Web site so a customer doesn’t have to keep answering challenge questions.

The technology for SiteKey is supplied by PassMark Security of Redwood City, Calif., Bank of America said. The SiteKey features are valuable in helping maintain the confidence of consumers as they do online banking, said James Van Dyke of Javelin Strategy & Research, which publishes an annual report on identity fraud. “This is definitely unique among large institutions,” he said. “Consumers want increased mechanisms to ensuring safety.”

Smaller organizations, in particular the Stanford Federal Credit Union, have preceded Bank of America in adopting more advanced security features, he said.

http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-5722035.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=zdnet

Read more

Voice of reason – Top Ten tips for VoIP

Posted on May 26, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

The ten tips, below, from C&C are intended to help organisations help themselves, use VoIP to improve the effectiveness of making their business critical information more accessible, yet secure.

1. Know your voice traffic
2. Know your data network
3. Logically separate voice from data
4. Use Quality of service (QoS) within a network
5. Security is as critical for voice as it is for data
6. Look to open standards
7. Examine the platform architecture of a VoIP/IPT platform
8. Adopt a modular solutions architecture
9. Converge data and network principals into one
10. Look for a roadmap with forward vision

http://www.ebcvg.com/articles.php?id=742

Read more

Put policies before products in IT security battle

Posted on May 24, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

Speaking at the AusCert conference on Queensland’s Gold Coast, where the survey was released yesterday, Gillespie said respondents admitted education has to be directed to IT security staff so they can more effectively manage the technology already in place.

“Between 98 and 100 percent of companies surveyed use antivirus software yet they are still getting infected; this wouldn’t be happening if tools were employed properly,” Gillespie said. Nearly 70 percent of respondents in the survey said their IT security staff have insufficient experience and training to meet the needs of their organization. About 79 percent are concerned about the level of security training for general staff, and 76 percent are concerned about the lack of training within their organizations.

The view within enterprises is that more dollars will solve security problems, but it is really about implementing and maintaining the right policies, Gillespie said.

“There is a lack of information security policies and poor education related to following policies. The failure of using policies was instrumental in the downfall of one of the world’s most famous chartered accountancy firms.”

http://www.arnnet.com.au/index.php/id%3B1011099138%3Bfp%3B8%3Bfpid%3B0

Read more

Tumbleweed Adds Outbound Protection To E-Mail Security Products

Posted on May 23, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

Tumbleweed Communications announced that it has extended its MailGate email security suite with Recurrent Pattern Detection technology.

The new addition enables Outbreak Detection in a new layer of defense against breaking spam, phishing, spyware, virus and worm attacks sent out in e-mail blasts.

Statistics compiled by the company indicate less than 10% of inbound enterprise message traffic is legitimate e-mail. Since the volume and complexity of malicious traffic grows, the company believes that multi-layer multi-technology approaches are proving to be the most successful at stopping both known and unknown e-mail threats.

The company has positioned the addition of Outbreak Detection to its MailGate products as providing customers with a more complete approach to inbound e-mail security. “We’re committed to providing our customers with an expansive arsenal of security features in order to combat increasingly sophisticated malicious email attacks,” said Tumbleweed CTO John Thielens. “Outbreak Detection, combined with Tumbleweed’s other protection technology, ensures that our customers are comprehensively protected.”

http://www.messagingpipeline.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=163700727

Read more

Your Five Biggest Network Vulnerabilities

Posted on May 23, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

To some extent, that’s the nature of the Internet beast; if you have a door open to the world, then it’s inevitable that someone will try to open it up. Dan Ingevalson, the director of professional security services at Internet Security Systems, says that enterprises have gotten better at managing security vulnerabilities, but the increasing complexity of networks and network-borne applications make perfect protection impossible. Having said that, some open doors are bigger and more common than others.

Network edge devices: Though well-publicized, worms and viruses continue to be a common and, to some extent, under-appreciated network threat says Yankee Group senior analyst Jim Slaby. “We haven’t seen a really big, really pervasive worm like Blaster or Slammer in some time, but they are waiting in the wings,” he says. “Signature defenses only work against things that you’ve seen before, or someone has seen before you, and they proliferate quickly.” Although the high-profile worms of the last years have trained network security personnel to respond quickly and apply patches diligently, penetration tests still find perimeter holes — big, gaping holes, according to Curphey. One company left a particularly flagrant open door to its networked printers, despite locking down every other process with a virtual private network (VPN). “The reasoning was that people could print without having to deal with the VPN,” Curphey says.

Web servers and Web applications: The Web is usually the meeting point between the enterprise and the outside world, and it is here that many organizations leave themselves vulnerable. “Attacks have typically moved up into the application layer, and that’s one of the hardest things to protect against because there’s no one-size fits all solution.

Unprotected mobile and off-site endpoints: Even with the edgdevices and Web servers locked up, one of the most common oversights is the vulnerabilities that organizations bring inside their networks.

Wireless networks: None of this is helped by the increasing prevalence of wireless networks.

Voice over IP: For all of the potential points of attack on enterprise networks, it’s sobering to think that the technological push for Voice over IP [VoIP] has added one more.

http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=163701258

Read more

Your Five Biggest Network Vulnerabilities

Posted on May 23, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

The correct answer to the question “where is my network vulnerable to attack?” To some extent, that’s the nature of the Internet beast; if you have a door open to the world, then it’s inevitable that someone will try to open it up. And there’s a good chance that they’re not doing it just to say hello.

Dan Ingevalson, the director of professional security services at Internet Security Systems, says that enterprises have gotten better at managing security vulnerabilities, but the increasing complexity of networks and network-borne applications make perfect protection impossible. “There is always going to be some level of complexity in a network that will create a network security vulnerability,” he says.

Having said that, some open doors are bigger and more common than others. A big part of maintaining network security, says Mark Curphey, senior director of consulting at Foundstone Services, a division of McAfee Inc., is knowing where these vulnerabilities are, and knowing how to plug them up.

Network edge devices: Though well-publicized, worms and viruses continue to be a common and, to some extent, under-appreciated network threat says Yankee Group senior analyst Jim Slaby. “We haven’t seen a really big, really pervasive worm like Blaster or Slammer in some time, but they are waiting in the wings,” he says. “It’s not that people are complacent, but the problem with worms is that they’re zero-day exploits. Signature defenses only work against things that you’ve seen before, or someone has seen before you, and they proliferate quickly.”

Although the high-profile worms of the last years have trained network security personnel to respond quickly and apply patches diligently, penetration tests still find perimeter holes — big, gaping holes, according to Curphey. “You see border routers with their admin interfaces open, so people can manage them from home,” he notes.

One company left a particularly flagrant open door to its networked printers, despite locking down every other process with a virtual private network (VPN). “The reasoning was that people could print without having to deal with the VPN,” Curphey says. “But the networked printers had IP addresses, making them a convenient and undefended jumping off point to the whole network.”

Web servers and Web applications: The Web is usually the meeting point between the enterprise and the outside world, and it is here that many organizations leave themselves vulnerable. With Web servers sitting off the firewall in a demilitarized zone (DMZ), they can often be the ideal gateways to internal company processes, according to Curphey. “Web servers without patches and passwords are frighteningly common,” he says. “It’s a lack of process, more than anything else. Organizations push these things out and someone forgets to update the software.”

According to Ingevalson, three-quarters of hacker attacks are on Web servers, since “that’s what’s out there.” This is particularly dangerous with the proliferation of Web applications. “Attacks have typically moved up into the application layer, and that’s one of the hardest things to protect against because there’s no one-size fits all solution.

Unprotected mobile and off-site endpoints: Even with the edge devices and Web servers locked up, one of the most common oversights is the vulnerabilities that organizations bring inside their networks.

Wireless networks: None of this is helped by the increasing prevalence of wireless networks. You just have to wander the streets of a big city like New York, opening your laptop in parks and cafes, to see how many unsecured wireless networks there are.

Voice over IP: For all of the potential points of attack on enterprise networks, it’s sobering to think that the technological push for Voice over IP [VoIP] has added one more. And it’s a vulnerability whose scale we haven’t even begun to consider.

http://www.networkingpipeline.com/163700201

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 294
  • 295
  • 296
  • 297
  • 298
  • 299
  • 300
  • …
  • 421
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme