Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Survey: Patch Management An Ongoing Challenge For Many Companies

Posted on March 4, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

The biggest problem when businesses are hit by a virus is user downtime.

The survey, completed last month by research firm InsightExpress and commissioned by SupportSoft Inc., a developer of software for managing software updates, portrays patch management as an ongoing issue that poses a variety of risks.

For example, patching still takes a week or longer at about a quarter of companies. That compares with 19% of respondents who say their IT organizations distribute patches to all computers within hours and 57% that do the job in days.

When asked how well prepared their IT organizations were for a virus attack, three-quarters are only “somewhat prepared,” compared with 21.3% that are completely prepared.

“It shows companies are struggling to get a handle on patching,” says Michael Cherry, an analyst with Directions On Microsoft.

The biggest concern among survey respondents is spyware, cited by 25%, followed by viruses and other kinds of malicious software. The most difficult part of patch management is an inability to update all systems with a single patch (24% of respondents) and the sheer number of patches that need to be distributed each month (21%).

Keeping up with Microsoft’s monthly security bulletins and associated software patches has been a challenge for some IT departments. In February, Microsoft issued a dozen security bulletins that addressed 17 vulnerabilities in Windows or its other products.

The negative effect most associated with viruses is end-user downtime, cited by 43% of respondents to the InsightExpress survey.

Chris Grejtak, senior VP of products and marketing with SupportSoft, says the survey underscores that remote and mobile computers are particularly hard to keep updated.

Microsoft’s Systems Management Server 2003 is used by some large companies to distribute updates to Microsoft products

http://www.securitypipeline.com/news/60405613;jsessionid=SUEDHZPSUU2BWQSNDBCCKHSCJUMEKJVN

Read more

McAfee Revamps Hosted Antivirus Service

Posted on March 4, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

Available only to solution providers in McAfee’s SecurityAlliance partner program, the new Partner Security Service gives solution providers a more flexible contract under which to work and offers expanded upselling opportunities, the partners said.

Based on the latest McAfee Managed VirusScan technology, the new service is a revised take on McAfee’s VirusScan ASaP, which has long prompted complaints from partners.

Dave Roberts, McAfee’s senior vice president of channels for North America, described the new service as “ideal” for businesses with limited IT expertise or personnel. “This service enables our channel partners to become managed service providers,” he said.

The Partner Security Service features a Web-based policy configuration tool that enables solution providers to manage multiple customers, schedule on-demand security scans and push out new capabilities, Roberts said.

“This new service takes care of everything for them and makes us look like geniuses.”

http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=5CWAFMGITIQIIQSNDBCCKH0CJUMEKJVN?articleID=60405775

Read more

Linux Security Rough Around The Edges, But Improving

Posted on March 3, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

For more than a decade, the National Security Agency has worked on a way to use a computer’s operating-systems to control where software applications and their users can access data within IT environments. The agency succeeded years ago in creating such “mandatory access control” features for specialized operating systems, but very few users had the access or inclination to deploy them.

“Quality of (software) code is crucial to the security of this nation,” Dickie George, technical director of NSA’s Information Assurance Directorate, said Thursday at an SELinux symposium. George added that the directorate’s mission is to research and develop the technology and processes that industry can use to protect itself, and critical U.S. infrastructure, from cyberattacks.

Debian, Novell, and Red Hat, three major distributors of the Linux operating system, only have recently released their own packages built on version 2.6 that allow customers to take advantage of some SELinux features.

Red Hat’s mid-February release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4—based upon the SELinux-friendly version 2.6 kernel—is an attempt to marry high-level security features with the basic operating system, says Donald Fischer, senior product manager for Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=5CWAFMGITIQIIQSNDBCCKH0CJUMEKJVN?articleID=60405086

Read more

Security layers improve Wi-Fi defenses

Posted on March 3, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

Speaking at the Wireless/RFID Conference and Exhibition in Washington, D.C., Kwon said the most secure layered approached would use the latest wireless grid technologies in combination with wireless intrusion-detection systems.

Because of the insecurities inherent in wireless technologies, a lot of fear exists, said Capt. “We’re a rather risk-averse bunch,” she said.

But attitudes toward wireless networks are changing as Defense Department officials learn more about managing risk with new technologies, she added. Few agencies, he said, are using layered security or “defense in depth” correctly when deploying wireless technologies. And on the policy side, he said, agencies need to ask who has the authority to accept risk for the organization when people begin using such technologies.

Wireless expert Bill Neugent, chief engineer for cybersecurity at Mitre, a nonprofit engineering organization, said that the proliferation of wireless technologies such as radio frequency identification chips and nanoscale “smart dust” will cause both privacy losses and productivity gains.

According to other wireless experts who offered tips on security technologies and policies, open-source products are the most popular for auditing the security of wireless networks. For the most part, wireless networks become open to attack because administrators fail to properly configure wireless access points with password protection, use no encryption, have no virtual private network protection, and do not disable the infrared ports and peer-to-peer features of their wireless networks, Kwon said.

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/computersecurity/infotheft/2005-03-02-security-layers_x.htm

Read more

Firefox sneaks into the enterprise

Posted on March 2, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

Tristan Nitot, the president of Mozilla Europe, speaking at the Free and Open source Developers’ European Meeting (FOSDEM) in Brussels on Sunday, said that he knows “a few companies” that have deployed the Firefox browser or Thunderbird mail client across 100,000 seats.

Companies are often reluctant to publicise that they have migrated from Microsoft Internet Explorer or Outlook to the open source browser or email application, as they are concerned that this may damage their relationship with Microsoft, according to Nitot. “I know companies that are deploying Firefox or Thunderbird, but they aren’t talking about it as they don’t want to see an increase in their [Microsoft] Office licence price,” said Nitot.

In the past, senior Microsoft executives have tried to prevent high-profile migrations to desktop open source applications. In 2003 Steve Ballmer met the mayor of Munich to dissuade him from replacing Microsoft Windows and Office with Linux and OpenOffice.org, the open source operating system and productivity application.

“They start talking about it and suddenly Ballmer comes in and twists your arm until you cry.”

Although Nitot was unwilling to reveal the names of any companies that have deployed Firefox, he said the French government is seriously considering deploying the application. The French Ministry of Defence is spending ¬7m (£4.8m) to build its own secure version of Linux, while the French Ministry of Equipment has decided to migrate 1,500 Windows NT servers to Linux.

It is essential that Firefox makes inroads in the enterprise before Microsoft launches the next version of IE, according to Nitot.

Other important issues for companies are the availability of commercial support and the ability to lock down the application to restrict what employees can do.

http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/0,2000061733,39182987,00.htm

Read more

CA to track employee behaviour

Posted on March 2, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

The company is combining identity and access management tools with its existing eTrust products. This “security management architecture”, as CA calls it, enables employees to keep a single identity when logging into different applications.

“CA is committed to providing security solutions that simplify security management across all platforms — mainframe and distributed,” said Toby Weiss, senior vice-president of eTrust security management at CA, in a press statement.

CA has not released full details of how it will integrate these tools into eTrust products, but said it would provide a “common security backbone” across all network technologies. The company claims eTrust will use open standards such as SAML, Kerberos and SAF to enable interoperability between different platforms, applications and security mechanisms. Currently only two CA products have the identity-tracking capability — eTrust CA-ACF2 r8 and eTrust CA-Top Secret Security r8, but the company said it would be integrated into all eTrust products in the future.

Compliance regulations, such as Sarbanes Oxley, mean that some companies have to be able to produce audit trails for all their employees or be liable for fines and imprisonment. CA said this was a reason for its move.

http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/security/0,39020375,39189762,00.htm

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 317
  • 318
  • 319
  • 320
  • 321
  • 322
  • 323
  • …
  • 421
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme