Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

SAP Introduces Security Service

Posted on December 18, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

SAP, one of the world’s foremost business software makers, has dubbed the package “SAP Security Optimization” (SSO).

As a platform, it searches for vulnerabilities in the system, other SAP applications, third party applications, middleware, interfaces as well as externally facing gateways to determine if there is an issue that needs fixed.

While the initial evaluation can take upwards of a couple of days, customers do receive a very comprehensive evaluation of security issues and vulnerabilities which are prioritized according to severity and probability — as well as a detailed plan of attack on how to deal with the issues.

http://www.ebcvg.com/articles.php?id=480

Read more

Microsoft snaps up anti-spyware firm

Posted on December 17, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

Microsoft said it plans to offer tools based on Giant’s technology that will help protect Windows PCs from spyware and other deceptive software. The technology complements security features available in Windows XP Service Pack 2, the company said.

A beta version of a tool based on Giant’s anti-spyware product will be available to Windows customers within one month, according to a statement from Microsoft. This beta version of the software will scan a user’s PC to locate spyware and enable customers to remove it, the company said. The tool will also be configurable, so users can block known spyware and other specific unwanted software from being installed on a computer.

The company didn’t disclose financial details of the acquisition, nor did it provide a timeline for the introduction of new products based on the technology, apart from the one-month estimate on the release of the beta.

Over the past couple of years, Microsoft’s Internet browser has been hit hard by security threats. Malicious code writers have targeted security holes in Internet Explorer to launch attacks and install spyware. These attacks are often launched when a victim clicks on a specific Web link, opening the door for criminals to take over the person’s computer. Once the PC is compromised, the attacker often can access information stored on the computer, load other software on the machine and delete files.

“Spyware is a serious and growing problem for PC users, and customers have made it clear that they want Microsoft to deliver effective solutions to protect against the threat,” Mike Nash, vice-president of Microsoft’s Security Business and Technology unit, said in a statement. “Through this acquisition we’re excited to be able to provide near-term relief to Windows customers by offering new technology to help keep spyware and other deceptive software off their PCs.”

http://news.zdnet.co.uk/business/0,39020645,39181459,00.htm

Read more

US GPS policy to be closely coordinated

Posted on December 17, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

The first GPS policy update in eight years strongly reaffirms the U.S. commitment to GPS technology, a positive signal for companies that develop, market and export related products for commercial, scientific and military uses. The United States will begin an aggressive promotion and tighter coordination oversight of its Global Positioning…

Read more

DHS Audit Unearths Security Weaknesses

Posted on December 17, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

In a report made public this week, the Office of Inspector General in the DHS warned that the audit turned up weaknesses in the systems used to avoid unauthorized access.

“Due to these remote access exposures, there is an increased risk that unauthorized people could gain access to DHS networks and compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of sensitive information systems and resources,” the report said.

The OIG also discovered that the DHS does not provide adequate or effective system security controls over remote access to its computer systems and data.

“In assessing the effectiveness of remote access controls, we identified several problems related to remote access host configurations, system patching, and the control of modems.

On the findings that system patches were not applied, Cooper said that all of the patches identified in the audit were in testing to be implemented.

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1743639,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594

Read more

Yankee Group Sees Open-Source Indemnification Nightmare

Posted on December 17, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

“A corporate Linux or open-source user that lacks indemnification and product warranty will expend its own time, money and resources fighting legal action,” said Laura DiDio, senior analyst for application infrastructure and software platforms at The Yankee Group. DiDio said that in the absence of indemnification or specific indemnification provisions, corporations could be the target of an intellectual property lawsuit that they would be forced to defend using their own money and resources.

In some cases, such as free open-source software, beta test software, steeply discounted software or software produced by nonprofits, the vendor may not realize enough of a profit to justify the cost of indemnifying its customers, DiDio said.

“Novell believes open-source software poses no greater risk of intellectual property infringement than does closed-source software, something this Yankee press release certainly doesn’t convey,” said Bruce Lowry, public relations director at Novell. “There’s been a lot of noise in the market around this issue of late, fanned by Microsoft and actions like this from the Yankee Group, but we’re not aware of any patent claim being filed against an open-source offering,” Lowry said.

“Prior to the announcement of blanket and total indemnification, if any user of Microsoft’s software was sued for patent infringement, the incentives would preclude Microsoft from abstaining and leaving their customer on their own, because if the customer lost, that would set precedent against the same Microsoft software used by anyone.”

Therefore, “in order to prevent the software from being stopped, Microsoft would—even without having given an indemnification—want to be involved with any case where its software is accused of infringement in order to protect, not its customer per se, but its software,” Ravicher said.

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1743663,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594

Read more

Survivor’s Guide to 2005: Security

Posted on December 17, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

Intrusion detection systems–the primary source of warnings that attacks are under way–are critical pieces of network-security infrastructure, providing detailed records of attacks, intrusions and unexpected network activity. For most enterprises, the IDS has become the central piece of security hardware, certainly the most visible piece to the staff. Without an IDS, the security staff must gather forensics information from firewall, server and router log files.

The mission of IDS is changing, however. Many IDS vendors are improving their products so that the IDS doesn’t simply give you the details on an event that has occurred. Instead, the system will help prevent intrusions from happening in the first place.

Even within the reporting realm, IDS is becoming more active as anomaly detection, vulnerability assessment and forensics come under the broad label of IDS’s reportable events. The growing number of attacks and attack types makes it more important for the IDS to correlate with logs and reports from other network-security components for context and ease of interpretation.

Schemes such as Cisco’s Network Admission Control (NAC) and Microsoft’s Network Access Protection (NAP) have, among many other capabilities, IDS and firewalls sharing some of the features of an IPS (intrusion prevention system), with the IDS feeding control information to a central authority, which then gives instruction to the firewall for connection reset and address blocking.

Last year, the verdict on IPSs was “don’t believe the hype.” As a piece of a multilayer security approach, an IPS can join the IDS, enterprise firewall, desktop firewall and application firewall to protect your key network assets.

For some, the blocking of even one piece of legitimate traffic is unacceptable.

As an incremental tool that can help cut down on the volume of attack traffic, intrusion prevention from vendors including Check Point Software, Internet Security Systems, Lucid Security, Radware and Tipping Point should be seriously explored in 2005.

The various governmental regulations, including HIPAA and GLB, make it business-critical for a company to protect customer and patient data from any theft or intrusions, and make it just as important that the company demonstrate that the protection is in place and effective.

Outside the conventional perimeter, software firewalls installed on mobile clients help move protection outside the bricks and mortar of the corporate boundaries, to slow the spread of mal-ware that can gain entry in Starbucks, traverse a VPN and run loose in the network core.

The intelligent integration of security functions, controlled by software that enforces intelligent policies, will be one of the great migrations of the year. Ask any vendor claiming to have an enterprise policy framework how many companies have partnered with them to let their products be queried and/or controlled by the central management console. The partnership issue should be more readily resolved by the industry giants that have introduced their own policy and access-control systems.

Both Cisco Systems with its NAC and Microsoft with NAP are building network-control frameworks on the basis of technology and products that are in the field, though neither company expects to have production deployments before the middle of the year.

At the same time, agencies and organizations have begun the work of building standards–the National Institute for Standards and Testing published ANSI INCITS 359-2004 (for role-based access control) in February 2004, and other organizations have committees beginning to look at the requirements for standards.

Although, in some ways, authentication is the boring brother-in-law of the security world, there is room for excitement as the world moves closer to the promised nirvana of single sign-on.

To comply with regulations, data must be protected from external threats and even successful intrusions cannot result in the release of protected data. Therefore, IDS and IPS must look at traffic flowing in both directions in order to defend the database and its supporting applications from giving up critical data.

Data storage devices that can take data away are also a significant concern. “Thumb drives,” small USB storage devices, have replaced floppy disks as the portable storage medium of choice for mobile professionals carrying presentations, software updates or small applications from office to office.

Instead of network security, more professionals are becoming involved in data assurance, network assurance or even business assurance, helping to protect the information against network intrusion, physical disaster or device theft.

http://www.securitypipeline.com/shared/article/printablePipelineArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=SLLOOGDEM1DNQQSNDBGCKH0CJUMEKJVN?articleId=55800918

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 332
  • 333
  • 334
  • 335
  • 336
  • 337
  • 338
  • …
  • 421
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme