Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Wi-Fi Security Spec Ratified

Posted on June 24, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

Proponents of the standard said that the 802.11i specification could have an immediate impact on VPN infrastructure, which could be relegated to a lesser role inside a corporate network.

The standard was ratified on 24th June at an IEEE standards committee meeting in Piscataway, N.J. The 802.11i standard adds a needed layer of security to Wi-Fi, which has become widespread both in the consumer and corporate spaces.

Early attempts at security, such as WEP (Wired Equivalent Privacy), provided some basic security but were derided as too easy to crack.

“Intel is ecstatic,” said Robin Ritch, director of security industry marketing for Intel Corp. in Santa Clara, Calif., who said all of the company’s Centrino chip sets, including the older models, are compliant with the specification.

As expected, vendors are already rolling out firmware enabling 802.11-compliant security protocols, although the software won’t officially be pushed to customers until September, when the Wi-Fi Alliance is expected to begin interoperability testing to make sure devices can talk to one another, Ritch said. Devices compliant with the 802.11i spec will likely be certified as compliant with WPA2, the second generation of Wi-Fi Protected Access, she said.

802.11i’s encryption protocols are based on the AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) and meet the limited encryption requirements for the Federal Information Processing Standard 140-2 specification for the protection of sensitive information.

The new standard will add Layer 2 security to a Wi-Fi card, sufficient for wireless access inside a corporate network, Ritch said.

In the early days of Wi-Fi, Intel recommended users connect to a VPN while roaming wirelessly, even when inside their corporate network.

The security provided by 802.11i is sufficient enough that IT managers can eliminate VPNs except when workers are connecting remotely, such as at a hotel, Ritch said.

Intel’s own IT staff plans to relax its security restrictions, she said, eliminating the use of internal VPNs while employees are inside their own network.

Chris Bolinger, manager of the Field and Partner Marketing team in the Wireless Networking Business Unit of Cisco Systems, Inc., Santa Clara, Calif., said it is natural that some customers will want to migrate away from VPNs to standards-based solutions such as 802.11i. However, many customers will also stay with WPA unless they’re given a compelling reason to move to AES, he said. “We’ve always tried to provide solutions to meet customer demand in the wireless LAN space,” Bolinger said.

The performance penalty users will pay for turning on the additional 802.11i functionality is unknown. In tests of Intel’s Grantsdale/Intel 915 chip set, for example, turning on high-definition audio features integrated into the chip set required a significant amount of CPU power, according to a recent ExtremeTech review. Intel spokesman Mark Miller said Intel had not tested the effects of the new 802.11i firmware on battery life to his knowledge, but he estimated that the effects would be “negligible” on the battery life of a Centrino-based notebook.

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1616979,00.asp

Read more

Device patrols border between Net and networks

Posted on June 21, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

Blue Coat’s ProxyAV, released Monday, is designed to deliver up to 249mbps throughput for “real-time” virus scanning, helping enterprises prevent Web-based viruses from entering their networks, without creating a bottleneck, Blue Coat said.

The new gear is designed to work with the company’s ProxySG system, which reviews Web objects and sends some to the ProxyAV for scanning.

ProxyAV scans the objects and sends them back to ProxySG for caching, so they can be reviewed more quickly the next time around, and repeated scanning can be avoided.

“The Proxy appliance is the key to implementing high-performance Web antivirus at the Internet gateway,” Steve Mullaney, vice president of marketing for Blue Coat, said in a statement.

Web-filtering tools can help companies check virus intrusion at the gateway between a company’s internal network and the wilds of the Internet.

Another company, ServGate, recently began selling software designed to help customers block pop-up ads, dangerous Web sites and viruses borne by Web browsers.

Customers can use Blue Coat’s Proxy setup with any antivirus software, such as products from McAfee and Panda Software, and can deploy a layered antivirus system across their companies.

http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5242128.html

Read more

Wallpaper designed to protect Wi-Fi networks

Posted on June 21, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

The company has produced panels designed to prevent outsiders from listening in on companies’ Wi-Fi traffic but let other traffic through, including radio and mobile phone signals.

The FSS (Frequency Selective Surface) panels are made in the same way as printed circuit boards, with layers of copper on Kapton polymer. These materials are also used in stealth bombers and fighter jets. The panels come in two varieties: passive, which is permanently turned on, and active, where various areas can be switched on and off to enlarge or limit the area of the network. The panels are 50 to 100 microns thick and can be applied to most surfaces, including glass.

A company representative said that they also helped reduce “noise” in buildings where a number of companies operate their own separate LANs (local area networks).

BAE Systems developed the new material with $265,000 (145,000 pounds) from the Radiocommunications Agency, which is now part of Ofcom.

The company will be developing it commercially through its corporate venture subsidiary.

More info: http://news.com.com/Wallpaper+designed+to+protect+Wi-Fi+networks/2100-7347_3-5241808.html?part=rss&tag=5241808&subj=news.7347.5

Read more

The Network Strikes Back: Experts Worry About Tech Retaliation

Posted on June 21, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

Symbiot Security says its new Intelligent Security Infrastructure Management Systems not only defends networks but lets them fight back, too.

Though the notion of striking back against “bad guys” may satisfy primal urges, most security experts question whether retaliation will actually halt cyberattacks. Ideas about going on the offensive against Internet attackers “have been bounced around for a while,” said senior analyst Jesse Dougherty of the security firm Sophos. Hackers, worms and data attacks are costing companies dearly, and open the door to identity theft and the loss of intellectual property.

The offering, known as iSIMS, comes amid growing frustration over computer intruders. In documents on the Austin, Texas, company’s Web site, Symbiot advocates a gradual escalation of action based on the best information available and the customer’s preference. A position paper attributed to Symbiot’s executives and posted on its Web site broadly outlines the counter-strike philosophy.

“On the Rules of Engagement for Information Warfare” says computer intrusions deserve a response in kind – including “asymmetric” countermeasures that can include flooding the attacking computers with data, rendering them Internet-blind, and other measures to neutralize the problem.

The responses mirrored the content of Symbiot’s Web site, which describes the 18-employee company as “emerging as a leader” in security infrastructure management. For instance, if a hacker takes advantage of vulnerabilities on multiple PCs to relay the assault through them, then the victim can trace it by exploiting the same vulnerabilities as the initial act.

In the past, some attempts to fight fire with fire have misfired. “We’ve seen worms that have had major impact like causing delays in airline schedules, shutting down ATM machines, 911 systems and so on,” said Dorothy Denning, a professor of defense analysis at the Naval Postgraduate School.

More info: http://www.crn.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=22101131

Read more

June News

Posted on June 20, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

From_the_desk_of_Paul_-_06152004.pdf

Read more

Network Associates Beefs Up Intrusion Defenses

Posted on June 19, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

“The combined IPS solution has protected against every recent outbreak, even zero-day attacks,” claimed Vimal Solanki, the director of marketing for McAfee’s IPS line.

IntruShield is moving to version 2.1, adding a first in the intrusion-detection system (IDS) and IPS market: the ability to protect encrypted attacks on SLL data transmissions by decrypting and inspecting the traffic. The integrity of the encrypted data and encryption keys are retained, said Solanki, and analysis of the data for signature, anomaly, and DoS attacks occurs in real time without degrading transaction speeds. Other changes to IntruShield include an internal, integrated firewall that protects the systems inside the network from attack, just as existing firewalls guard the perimeter.

IntruShield’s firewall can be sliced and diced in a virtualization mode to set policies for individual machines, groups of desktops or servers, or the entire network. Version 5.0 defends desktops and servers against traditional as well as zero-day attacks-so-called because they exploit vulnerabilities not yet patched–by using signatures and profiles of known and anticipated threats. Like its IntruShield cousin, Entercept 5.0 adds integrated firewall capabilities to provide more protection between individual systems and the rest of the network, or the Internet in general.

More info: http://www.securitypipeline.com/news/21700492;jsessionid=HPOWFZ5SDH2U4QSNDBNCKHY

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 368
  • 369
  • 370
  • 371
  • 372
  • 373
  • 374
  • …
  • 421
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme