Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Virus alerts explode

Posted on April 2, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini
Read more

MSBlast epidemic far larger than believed

Posted on April 2, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

The latest data comes from the software giant’s ability to track the usage of an online tool that its engineers created to clean systems infected with the worm.

Since the January release of the tool, more than 16 million of the systems that connected to Microsoft’s Windows Update service were found to be infected with MSBlast and were offered a patch and the use of the disinfecting tool, the software giant told CNET News.com.

During the same period, about 8 million systems actually called on Update to patch them and prevent reinfection and used the special tool to remove the worm.

Though Microsoft believes the total number of users infected by the worm is likely closer to the higher, 16 million, tally, the 8 million figure may provide a more solid indication of the minimum number of systems hit.

The larger number may include systems counted more than once, as busy computers users declined to deal with the worm immediately, or canceled the process once it had begun, only to return to Windows Update later.

Once those systems were disinfected and patched, however, they would not be re-counted.

Microsoft did not track what systems, specifically, used the tool, just that it was used.

Late last year, “we knew we were getting reports from customers saying that they were still seeing symptoms of Blaster,” said Stephen Toulouse, security program manager for Microsoft’s security response center.

“Our Internet service provider partners were seeing a lot of Blaster traffic on their networks as well.”

In fact, the worm hit so hard that the company quickly asked some development teams to stop work on the software giant’s next version of Windows and create an interim update, known as Service Pack 2, to enhance the security of Windows XP.

Moreover, several months of complaints led Microsoft to augment Windows Update with the online tool to detect and clean the MSBlast worm.

The tool has also given Microsoft an invaluable data point to quantify the threat of such Internet worms.

Already, the size of the digital epidemic far exceeds the estimates of researchers who have tracked the worm since it first started spreading, on Aug. 11.

Typically, researchers try to estimate the size of a worm epidemic by collecting data from the records of network devices, such as firewalls and intrusion detection systems.

By aggregating the information from the devices, researchers can count the number of Internet addresses from which a worm, such as MSBlast, is trying to spread.

Most Internet security organizations had believed that at most 500,000 systems had been compromised by the self-propagating program.

“I don’t doubt (the new) number,” said Johannes Ullrich, chief technology officer for the Internet Storm Center, which collects firewall logs from thousands of volunteers in order to gauge which digital threats are spreading on the Internet.

Using the voluntarily submitted records, the Internet Storm Center had tallied enough Internet addresses to estimate that between 200,000 and 500,000 computers had been infected by the worm.

Another threat tracker, security company Symantec, has agreements with the owners of some 20,000 network devices to use their records for analysis.

The company crunches the numbers to keep track of threats on the Internet, and though it stopped counting once the MSBlast worm spread to more than 40,000 computers, Symantec estimated that “a couple hundred thousand” systems may have been compromised, said Alfred Huger, senior director of engineering for the company.

“However, I can’t contest it; they have the best insight.

Windows Update patches the vulnerability that allows the MSBlast to spread, but before January, it didn’t eradicate the worm from the compromised system.

They seemingly needed time to acclimate to a new reality where a single worm or virus could threaten millions of computers.

http://news.com.com/2100-7349_3-5184439.html?tag=nefd_top

Read more

Open-source flaw database opens its doors

Posted on April 2, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

The Open Source Vulnerability Database (OSVDB) has launched a free Web site that catalogues security flaws in Internet-related software. It will, say its creators, promote more open collaboration between companies and individuals “and reduce expenses inherent with the development and maintenance of in-house vulnerability databases”. There are various specialist mailing…

Read more

U.S. Goals Solicited On Software Security

Posted on April 2, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

The federal government should set goals for reducing flaws in computer software that allow attacks by hackers, and other regulations might be necessary to better protect cyberspace, an industry task force said yesterday. Despite rising incidents of worms, viruses and identity fraud that have cost businesses and consumers as much…

Read more

One in three firms suffer hacking attempts

Posted on March 23, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

One in three of the UK’s biggest companies has suffered hacking attempts on their websites in the last year, a government-sponsored survey has revealed. According to the 2004 Department of Trade and Industry biennial Information Security Breaches Survey, conducted by a consortium led by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), four per cent of…

Read more

AT&T intrusion alerting and firewall services help thwart cybersecurity attacks

Posted on March 23, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

AT&T has introduced two new security services, AT&T Internet Protect and AT&T Personal Firewall, to give businesses and government agencies worldwide some of the most powerful weapons available to date in their ever-increasing battle against cyber security attacks.

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 379
  • 380
  • 381
  • 382
  • 383
  • 384
  • 385
  • …
  • 421
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme