These two areas of the act — sections 302 and 404, respectively — are certainly key, and one out of three financial officers charged with ensuring their company reaches compliance with financial regulations cites them as the most challenging, according to a survey from Protiviti, which provides independent internal audit and business and technology risk consulting services.
However, 27 percent say aligning audit committee activity with legal and regulatory requirements is the most difficult part of Sarbanes-Oxley, and 23 percent cite recruiting an audit committee financial expert. “Publicly traded firms remain under intense pressure from boards and shareholders to meet the new governance requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley, the SEC, the exchanges and other regulatory bodies,” Protiviti Managing Director Everett Gibbs says.
1. Four out of 10 CFOs overall and 33 percent at large companies say the act has led or will lead to changes in the makeup of their boards or board committees.
2. In 83 percent of firms, management decided on its own to provide more information to the board and its committees.
3. Slightly less than half of the companies surveyed have formed a disclosure committee.
4. Disclosure committees are more common among large companies (74 percent have formed one) than small companies (33 percent).
5. Ensuring the independence of external auditing is also a priority for CFOs.
6. A number of survey respondents say it’s still too early to know how much it costs to reach full compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley.
More info: [url=http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/?q=node/view/556]http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/?q=node/view/556[/url]