Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Inverting the IT pyramid

Posted on January 22, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

Whether it is IT outsourcing, business process outsourcing, managed services or utility computing services, any IT service that helps enterprises increase productivity and reduce costs is in demand.

The IT industry has been turned upside down, or inverted, as former technology leaders transform themselves into services leaders, and other companies seek to follow their lead. For instance, IBM and Hewlett-Packard have won the greatest recognition and most significant customer contracts in the utility computing market to date on the strength of their outsourcing and integration capabilities, more than the technical features of their utility computing products.

Technology-centric companies such as EMC and Sun Microsystems are struggling to keep pace in the utility computing market, and have recently begun to shift their business models to emphasize their services as much as their products.

Many organizations are frustrated with the inefficiencies of their current IT operations and concerned about buying more technology and adding more staff to satisfy their business requirements. For many hardware and software technology companies this shift in demand represents a significant challenge.

Even harder than changing the operational processes for many long-standing technology companies is changing the corporate cultures of these places. Many IT companies attempting to restructure their organizations so they can deliver more of their technical capabilities via services are learning how hard it is to invert their business models.

Part of Big Blue’s success has come from internal organizational and cultural changes, and part by acquiring consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers. Putting services out in front is a dramatic change for the IT industry. Gone are the days when IT installation and maintenance services were slaves to the product side of vendor shops.

As the demand for new technology continues to languish and product differentiation continues to fade, IT services has become a key strategic competitive weapon as well as an essential vehicle for delivering meaningful business solutions.

More info: [url=http://news.com.com/2010-7343_3-5144562.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=news]http://news.com.com/2010-7343_3-5144562.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=news[/url]

Read more

Issues to address in your incident management policy

Posted on January 21, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

This article provides tips on what to include in your policy is excerpted from an article on incident management published by their sister publication Information Security magazine.

An effective incident management program must assign responsibilities and specify routine procedures in the event of an incident.

Next, getting down to brass tacks, your computer incident response team (CIRT) policy should specify first responders, responsibility for management of the response to a specific incident, and follow-up and reporting responsibilities.

That’s the mostly-technical first part of a more detailed and comprehensive IMP. Besides the MIS and network technical staff who are first responders, who should be part of the IMP?

At the very least: risk management, corporate legal, corporate security, public relations, human resources and labor relations, the office responsible for regulatory compliance, and all major business units with oversight and advisory responsibility. Further, while initial response in many cases will be technical, IT staff can’t make decisions in a vacuum.

California’s Database Security Breach Notification Act (SB 1386), which went into effect last July, requires companies to inform California customers of incidents involving the compromise of their names in combination with their Social Security, driver’s license or credit card numbers.

More info: [url=http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid14_gci945247,00.html]http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid14_gci945247,00.html[/url]

Read more

An IT Manager

Posted on January 21, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

Surveys show that any large organisation lose between 3-5% of their laptops every year.

Relaying laptop theft stories in the local pub is almost as common-place as people boasting how much their houses have shot-up in price over the last two years. However, with an increasingly mobile workforce, often using privately bought mobile devices, the board and IT departments have to take greater notice of who is carrying what around with them and take a rain check of the damage that could be caused if this information was lost and broadcast to the outside world.

[i]One[/i] You must have a mobile Use policy or ensure that your corporate IT security policy has specific provision for mobile devices and you update it whenever you adopt new hardware categories such as combined PDA/phones.
[i]Two[/i] Take the responsibility of IT security away from the end-user and centrally manage and deploy it.
[i]Three[/i] Invest in a solution which is usable and flexible.
[i]Four[/i] Have a blanket approach to security by owning every mobile device that leaves your office and make access control and encryption mandatory.
[i]Five[/i] Be realistic with passwords
[i]Six[/i] Become a realist

Read more

Check Point launches dewormer for internal networks

Posted on January 20, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

Nick Lowe, Check Point director for Northern Europe, says his firm’s approach scores over Cisco’s Network Admission Control program by avoiding the need to install client software.

InterSpect appliances are based on Check Point’s Stateful Inspection and Application Intelligence technologies and designed specifically to inspect the protocols and applications used on internal networks.

According to Check Point, InterSpect is better than products designed for perimeter security within Intranet environments because of its greater awareness of internal applications and protocols (such as database protocol SQL).

More info: [url=http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/35003.html]http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/35003.html[/url]

Read more

Outsourcers need industry savvy

Posted on January 15, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

The outsourcing providers–which included IBM, Accenture, Electronic Data Systems and Hewlett-Packard–are all technically competent, Meta analyst Dean Davison said.

A customer choosing between them should consider factors such as industry-specific knowledge and how their corporate cultures mesh with its own, he suggested.

IBM, Electronic Data Systems, Computer Sciences, Accenture and Science Applications International Corp. all made it into Meta’s category of outsourcing “leader.”

More info: [url=http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104_2-5141899.html]http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104_2-5141899.html[/url]

Read more

Target-based IDS muffles the noise to take aim on the alerts that count

Posted on January 14, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

Most commercial NIDSes depend on attack signatures to identify malicious or out-of-policy activity. Signature-based NIDS is a very CPU-intensive technology. Before comparing packets against the NIDS database of a thousand or more signatures, the sensors also have to perform a variety of compute-intensive operations such as HTTP normalization, converting URLs in HTTP data streams to a canonical format so that they can be compared against a list of known bad traffic. To keep from losing packets, NIDS signature writers generally only match against the minimum amount of data needed to validate an attack.

Some IDS vendors are working on making their signature and detection engines smarter, but others are taking a different path: target-based IDS. Take additional information about systems and change the signal-to-noise ratio to increase the signal and decrease the noise. You’d still get an alert for an attack packet, but if the attack were simply noise, the alert would be given a low priority.

Early entries in this field include Tenable Network Security’s Lightning Console, Cisco Systems’ Cisco Threat Response (CTR) and Internet Security Systems’ Fusion. These products combine traditional network scanning and vulnerability analysis with IDS alerting consoles. They all take in the raw alerts from your IDS consoles, but they “qualify” each alert based on whether your system is actually vulnerable.

The result: Far fewer alerts and analysis in minutes instead of hours.

This article takes a look at the nature of the beast these new tools are trying to tame.

More info: [url=http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid14_gci944401,00.html]http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid14_gci944401,00.html[/url]

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 389
  • 390
  • 391
  • 392
  • 393
  • 394
  • 395
  • …
  • 421
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme