Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Category: Regulations

U.K. outlaws denial-of-service attacks

Posted on November 10, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Among the provisions of the Police and Justice Bill 2006, which gained Royal Assent on Wednesday, is a clause that makes it an offense to impair the operation of any computer system.

http://sympatico-msn-ca.com.com/UK+outlaws+denial-of-service+attacks/2100-7348_3-6134472.html?part=sympatico-msn-ca&tag=feed_2570&subj=ns_6134472

Read more

Europe prepares for data breach notification legislation

Posted on October 19, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Rob Gretton, Business Development Director for DISUK commented: “This legislation is a step in the right direction as anything that empowers the individual and gives them more information is a good thing.

Identity theft is not just a problem on the Internet; it can happen in much less visible ways. Thefts and losses of backup tapes mean that large volumes of personal information such as, mother’s maiden name, date of birth or national insurance number are exposed to potential misuse at any time in the future.

http://www.it-observer.com/news/6910/europe_prepares_data_breach_notification_legislation/

Read more

Saudi passes cybercrime laws

Posted on October 15, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

The maximum punishment under the new legislation is a prison sentence of ten years and a fine of US$1.3million, which can be imposed on anyone found guilty of hacking into government networks to steal information related to national security or using the internet in support of terrorism.

Any person who gains unauthorised access to a public network or who installs viruses on that network will be subject to a fine of around US$800,000 and/or up to four years in prison.

http://www.itp.net/news/details.php?id=22318&srh=&tbl=itp_news

Read more

Compliance: A Multi-Front War

Posted on October 11, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

“Enterprises are doing all of their compliance work in silos, and they aren’t seeing the commonality between [the projects], particularly in the area of security,” says Stephen Barlock, North America security lead at Accenture. “The net result is that their compliance efforts are much too complex.”

Enterprises are also finding that the costs of their compliance efforts are rising, not falling, because of the growing number of independent, and sometimes redundant, regulatory efforts, says Mark Perry, vice president of global consulting services at Symantec, who will head the joint venture.

SOX and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) mandate data protection, but don’t give any IT specifics. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Payment Card Industry (PCI) standards outline more specific requirements.

“What we encourage companies to do is build a matrix of the requirements,” says Chris Apgar, president of Apgar and Associates LLC, a compliance consulting firm. If they meet the most stringent security requirements on the matrix in each category, the result should be a security platform that meets the compliance mandates of all of them. For example, if you look at SOX and GLBA, they don’t say much about encryption,” Apgar says.

Accenture and Symantec are working on a way to automate the process of correlating the security requirements of each regulatory mandate and identifying the most stringent elements, says Accenture’s Barlock. “With this joint venture with Symantec in place, though, we think the days of doing this manually are numbered.” “If you want to encrypt email, a $250,000 package from Tumbleweed is a pretty sure thing to pass an audit,” he says.

http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=106910&WT.svl=news2_5

Read more

ISO 17799 and 27001: Setting the Standards for Information Security

Posted on October 2, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

ISO 17799 provides best practice recommendations for initiating, implementing, or maintaining information security management systems. The standard contains 12 sections: risk assessment and treatment; security policy; organization of information security; asset management; access control; information security incident management; human resources security; physical and environmental security; communications and operations management; information systems acquisition, development and maintenance; business continuity management; and compliance. Within each section, information security control objectives are specified and a range of controls. For each control, implementation guidance is provided.

The second standard, ISO 27001, specifies requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an information security management system consistent with the best practices outlined in ISO 17799. ISO 27001 is the first standard in a proposed series of information security standards which will be assigned numbers within the ISO 27000 series. ISO 17799 is expected to be renamed ISO 27002 in 2007. ISO 27001 is the formal standard against which organizations may seek independent certification of their information security management systems. It contains a total of 133 controls in eleven sections.

Certification is entirely voluntary but is increasingly being demanded from suppliers and business partners who are concerned about information security.

The management processes implemented for ISO 27001 are based on the Deming cycle of continuous improvement: Plan-Do-Check-Act. Measuring effectiveness is a critical element of improving information security management, and hence realizing business benefit and flexibility in a changing environment.

http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=165

Read more

Credit Card Giants Modify Security Specs

Posted on September 9, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

PCI, which includes specifications for both physical and logical security of credit card data, is required for all merchants who accept credit cards or store credit information. Merchants that don’t comply could face fines as high as $500,000, or, in extreme cases, could have their ability to accept credit cards revoked.

PCI 1.0 was issued two years ago, and merchants were supposed to have achieved compliance by the deadline of June 30 of this year.

Experts say the new guidelines are more clear about “compensating controls,” which give merchants a bit more flexibility in their deployment of encryption and other PCI requirements. David Taylor, vice president of data security strategies at Protegrity and a former industry analyst, isn’t so sure. “The new specs are definitely clearer, and that’s great, but I think a lot of merchants were hoping that the new rules would make it easier to comply, and that didn’t happen,” he says.

PCI auditors previously had hoped that PCI 1.1 would somehow divide the specifications between critical requirements — such as the need for encryption and firewalls — and best practices, such as thorough documentation and training.

http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=103292&WT.svl=news2_1

Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • …
  • 21
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI Ops Weekly — September 6, 2026
  • AI Ops Weekly — September 6, 2026 — Interactive Topic Map
  • AI & Machine Learning Security — September 6, 2026

Archives

  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • November 2025
  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • AI-Ops
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • Competitive
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • IT/OT Security
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2026 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme