Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Category: Regulations

Survey on Industry Measures taken to comply with National Measures

Posted on May 4, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Guidelines for this directive include:
· There should be an incentive for providers to contribute to the overall security of interconnected networks rather than protecting merely their own resources.
· Providers need to be more proactive and monitor their networks for risks of security breaches. Providers could also be asked to report which networks they monitor.
· This includes guidance to consumers as well as guidance to the provider’s staff, in particular with regard to incident response and emergency planning.
· The need for contact details for email abuse and security violations should also be stressed.

Providers in Europe are more concerned about spam emails that their customers receive than they are concerned with spam that their customers send.

http://www.enisa.eu.int/doc/pdf/deliverables/enisa_security_spam.pdf

Read more

FCC adtops order to enable law enforcement to access certain broadband and VoIP providers

Posted on May 4, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

The record indicates that TTPs are available to provide a variety of services for CALEA compliance to carriers, including processing requests for intercepts, conducting electronic surveillance, and delivering relevant information to LEAs. Fifth, the Order restricts the availability of compliance extensions under CALEA section 107(c) to equipment, facilities and services deployed prior to October 25, 1998 and clarifies the role and scope of CALEA section 109(b), under which carriers may be reimbursed for their CALEA compliance costs. Seventh, the Order concludes that carriers are responsible for CALEA development and implementation costs for post-January 1, 1995 equipment and facilities, and declines to adopt a national surcharge to recover CALEA costs. -FCC-

http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/newslog/FCC+Adopts+Order+To+Enable+Law+Enforcement+Access+To+Broadband+And+VoIP+Providers.aspx

Read more

Despite Stricter Rules in Europe, US Companies More Advanced in Protecting Data

Posted on April 27, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

“The study further shows that European corporate privacy leaders are more likely to hold the view that their role is inextricably tied to advancing a culture of responsible information use rather than establishing technical or administrative controls over privacy and data protection,” said Larry Ponemon, founder of the Ponemon Institute, who led the research team. Most European companies have a strict “no share” policy for consumer and employee data.

US companies are more likely to employ information security technologies to protect or safeguard sensitive personal information than European firms, including the use of encryption, intrusion detection systems and website monitoring.

Whether in established or emerging markets, the hallmark of White & Case is our complete dedication to the business priorities and legal needs of our clients.

http://www.whitecase.com/news/Detail.aspx?news=1091

Read more

N.Y. County (Wincehster) Enacts Wireless Security Law

Posted on April 20, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Experts warned that the law would not fully protect anyone from dedicated hackers but acknowledged it could raise awareness of the vulnerabilities inherent in wireless technology.

http://entmag.com/news/rss.asp?editorialsid=7368

Read more

Texas works on P2P policy

Posted on April 14, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Any statewide policy, however, would not apply to the legislative and judicial branches or to the state’s constitutional officers, although they could adopt it, the executive order states.

Other state governments have enacted similar P2P use policies.

http://www.fcw.com/article94067-04-13-06-Web

Read more

New China Spam Regulations

Posted on April 4, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

China’s Ministry of Information Industry has adopted the Measures for the Administration of Internet E-mails. The regulations, which took effect from 30 March 2006, are designed to apply to email service providers and apply to any person operating an email service for Internet users in Mainland China.

The regulations are as follows:

A provider is defined as any person in the service supply chain involved in delivering or helping users to receive email;
Service providers must register with the government and obtain a license before providing email services;
Violators face warnings or penalties of up to 30,000 yuan (approx. $3,700 US) and risk losing their license;
Firms are barred from sending unsolicited commercial messages without prior consent from recipients;
All commercial email must have a subject header of “AD” or the Chinese character for advertisement;
The rules only apply to email containing commercial advertisements;
The rules state that providers must stop delivery of any messages containing commercial advertisements even if a recipient first consents, but later changes his or her mind.

http://www.tid.gov.hk/english/aboutus/tradecircular/cic/asia/2006/files/ci200681a.pdf

Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • The CISO Brief — June 7, 2026
  • DevSecOps Weekly — June 7, 2026
  • Agentic NetOps Weekly — June 7, 2026 (Cisco Live US 2026 Edition)
  • AI & ML in Security — June 7, 2026
  • Security Operations Weekly — June 7, 2026

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • November 2025
  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2026 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme